Yes, links to such claims would help. Damsgaard did set-up his own clinic however, and that right there sends up a red flag for me as a conflict of interest, as he's taking money directly from customers (teams) he's supposed to watch over. Not good.
One area I completely agree with Big Boat is power output (wattage) and hemoglobin testing. These really need to be included in any biological passport program in the future. Lemond was right when he challenged Catlin and Lance last year (Greg also suggested testosterone profiling).
Something interesting regarding the ethics of doping in the sport. I think we've pretty much come to the conclusion in not just cycling, but baseball and other sports, where the lying about doping is actually more damaging than the actual doping itself. Take a look at the hot water Roger Clemens is in compared to Andy Pettit for example.
Those of us who have paid close attention to this over the last several years all conclude that pretty much everyone in cycling doped at one time or another, to one degree or another, especially those that showed big performances and gains, and today is probably better, but still with problems. We already assume this is true. But when a rider gets caught and just constantly denies it, it's just laughable and makes them look like a scam artist who takes us all for fools. Take a look at the Tyler Hamilton case. If he finally came clean, I don't think anyone would be shocked or show any dismay. The vast majority of people would probably respect him a little for finally owing up to the obvious and telling the truth.
I don't think we've reached the point where an accused athlete who didn't do anything would be better off just confessing, but I hope we don't get there. Koldo Gil comes close, but he's mostly just been railroaded by the UCI who won't cross-reference his DNA like he offers, leaving him blackballed from the sport.