• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

La Vuelta: Where Miracles Really Do Occur

Mosquera
Cobo/Froome
Horner
Dumoulin

Oh, and let’s not forget the guy who came in 4th in 1998, the first ever sign he could compete in a GT.

And all those riders who suddenly became ITT specialists at the Vuelta? It didn’t begin this year.
 
Aug 11, 2012
416
0
0
I dont know how many times I need to repeat this. This is always been the case in the Vuelta. ALWAYS.

Roberto Córdoba
José Luis Navarro
Guido Van Calster
Jørgen Marcussen
Ivan Ivanov
Óscar de Jesús Vargas
Yvon Madiot
Edgar Corredor
Marc Durant
Antonio Coll Pantanilla
Omar Hernández
Pedro Saúl Morales
Giuseppe Perletto
Jean-Claude Bagot
Santiago Lazcano
Régis Clère
Francisco Rodríguez
Gary Clively
José Recio
José Luis Viejo
Luc Suykerbuyk
José Martins
Pierre Raymond Villemiane

Etc etc and etcetera.

Are these known GC riders ? No. Yet they all finished top10 in the Vuelta, some even podium.

Why cant people give this a rest.
 
Aug 11, 2012
416
0
0
hrotha said:
[quote=""Jeff"":3ca46w3u]This is always been the case in the Vuelta. ALWAYS.
Yeah, that kinda is the whole premise of this thread.[/quote]The undertone is that they are doped. I might be accused of being a homer again, but its a shame that Dumoulin is listed with the other three names. Than he has an agenda. He could easily list a truckload of other riders, but no, two highly suspisious winners and a known doper.
 
Sep 29, 2012
12,197
0
0
"Jeff"":1vcwj1yv][quote="hrotha said:
[quote=""Jeff"":1vcwj1yv]This is always been the case in the Vuelta. ALWAYS.
Yeah, that kinda is the whole premise of this thread.[/quote]The undertone is that they are doped. I might be accused of being a homer again, but its a shame that Dumoulin is listed with the other three names. Than you have an agenda.[/quote]

Froome and Horner were never tested positive. Are you suggesting they are dopers?

That is incredibly hypocritical.
 
Aug 11, 2012
416
0
0
Dear Wiggo said:
"Jeff"":3iof4gvz][quote="hrotha said:
[quote=""Jeff"":3iof4gvz]This is always been the case in the Vuelta. ALWAYS.
Yeah, that kinda is the whole premise of this thread.
The undertone is that they are doped. I might be accused of being a homer again, but its a shame that Dumoulin is listed with the other three names. Than you have an agenda.[/quote]

Froome and Horner were never tested positive. Are you suggesting they are dopers?

That is incredibly hypocritical.[/quote]I am talking about Mosquera, Cobo and Horner.
 
I remember once looking at the results of the 1996 Vuelta, the last GT where you could shoot up to high heaven before the party poopers at UCI put in the 50% rule. In 4th and 5th place came Roberti Pistore and Stefano Faustini. Who? Yeah exactly, never heard from again after that race.

Must be something in the air over there.
 
Aug 11, 2012
416
0
0
Re:

classicomano said:
I remember once looking at the results of the 1996 Vuelta, the last GT where you could shoot up to high heaven before the party poopers at UCI put in the 50% rule. In 4th and 5th place came Roberti Pistore and Stefano Faustini. Who? Yeah exactly, never heard from again after that race.

Must be something in the air over there.
Exactly, those two as well. Problem is, its useless to come up with examples from the 90s because than you know for certain doping is a factor.

Obviously there has always been doping in every decade, but you have to rely on something otherwise we can better quit.

The Vuelta is just a very strange race. People can talk about competition, now again, but Hrotha is plain right. Competition is not only those who are participating.
 
"Jeff"":2xbor31b][quote="Dear Wiggo said:
"Jeff"":2xbor31b][quote="hrotha said:
[quote=""Jeff"":2xbor31b]This is always been the case in the Vuelta. ALWAYS.
Yeah, that kinda is the whole premise of this thread.
The undertone is that they are doped. I might be accused of being a homer again, but its a shame that Dumoulin is listed with the other three names. Than you have an agenda.[/quote]

Froome and Horner were never tested positive. Are you suggesting they are dopers?

That is incredibly hypocritical.[/quote]I am talking about Mosquera, Cobo and Horner.[/quote]

Cobo and Horner never tested positive. You clearly have an agenda against them :rolleyes:
 
"Jeff"":1abptmyq][quote="Dear Wiggo said:
"Jeff"":1abptmyq][quote="hrotha said:
[quote=""Jeff"":1abptmyq]This is always been the case in the Vuelta. ALWAYS.
Yeah, that kinda is the whole premise of this thread.
The undertone is that they are doped. I might be accused of being a homer again, but its a shame that Dumoulin is listed with the other three names. Than you have an agenda.[/quote]

Froome and Horner were never tested positive. Are you suggesting they are dopers?

That is incredibly hypocritical.[/quote]I am talking about Mosquera, Cobo and Horner.[/quote]
While certainly surprising Vuelta-winners, both Horner and Cobo were proven climbers a long time before their Vuelta wins. Their performances were a lot less surprising than what Dumoulin has managed this year. I cannot see why Dumoulin's miracle performance doesn't belong in this thread.
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
Re:

[quote=""Jeff"":3f3y80cq]I dont know how many times I need to repeat this. This is always been the case in the Vuelta. ALWAYS.

Roberto Córdoba
José Luis Navarro
Guido Van Calster
Jørgen Marcussen
Ivan Ivanov
Óscar de Jesús Vargas
Yvon Madiot
Edgar Corredor
Marc Durant
Antonio Coll Pantanilla
Omar Hernández
Pedro Saúl Morales
Giuseppe Perletto
Jean-Claude Bagot
Santiago Lazcano
Régis Clère
Francisco Rodríguez
Gary Clively
José Recio
José Luis Viejo
Luc Suykerbuyk
José Martins
Pierre Raymond Villemiane

Etc etc and etcetera.

Are these known GC riders ? No. Yet they all finished top10 in the Vuelta, some even podium.

Why cant people give this a rest.[/quote]

Why accept doping and cheating?

It is not mandatory for fans to read the clinic never mind post.

I will give it a rest when i feel that testing is fully funded, fully independent, effective and the omerta is dead.
 
Re:

Moose McKnuckles said:
Pecharroman would have smashed the Vuelta in his heyday.


don't think there is a rider that put a big smile on my face as JA Pecharroman. Best robery ever. :D

Whenever Lefevre is even only asociated with an Iberian rider his name comes up. Love it! :cool: :p
 
Re:

[quote=""Jeff"":29ssxts0]I dont know how many times I need to repeat this. This is always been the case in the Vuelta. ALWAYS.

[/quote]

Your point seems to be that there have been many surprising performances in the Vuelta, most of them by non-dopers, therefore it’s unfair to list Dumoulin with surprising performances by riders who have either tested positive or are suspicious. The problem I have with this is a) most of these surprising performances you list are not nearly as hard to understand as Dumoulin’s (he hasn’t had lots of previous experience in GTs, and he’s not just going to finish in the top 10--which often happens through luck, getting in a break--but almost certainly in the top 2); and b) every single one of the riders you listed competed before the blood doping era. GTs were raced very differently then.

I’ve listed Dumoulin’s performance with other surprising ones in the Vuelta during the same era. If you think you can find other surprising performances in this era by riders who are not suspicious, please list them.
 
Re: Re:

"Jeff"":13ok34oo][quote="classicomano said:
I remember once looking at the results of the 1996 Vuelta, the last GT where you could shoot up to high heaven before the party poopers at UCI put in the 50% rule. In 4th and 5th place came Roberti Pistore and Stefano Faustini. Who? Yeah exactly, never heard from again after that race.

Must be something in the air over there.
Exactly, those two as well. Problem is, its useless to come up with examples from the 90s because than you know for certain doping is a factor.

Obviously there has always been doping in every decade, but you have to rely on something otherwise we can better quit.

The Vuelta is just a very strange race. People can talk about competition, now again, but Hrotha is plain right. Competition is not only those who are participating.[/quote]

How do you know for certain everyone in the 1990's was doping. Why couldn't they just "train hard" like Schippers, Bolt, Wiggins etc do and still beat all the doped times.