He aimed for a top 10, he said in interviews.
It goes to show that you are the one that is smirking when you see GvA got 7th and you imagined he was dreaming of winning. Sorry to burst your bubble, because he wasn't dreaming. Bakelants and Zonneveld were aiming higher (i.e. a podium or a win), but both got punctures while still in the position to reach their goals.
If you can't name 7-8 road riders that would push 7-8 riders out of the current top 10, it goes to show there is no logic in your resaoning, because Haga and Morton were road riders, and they got 1st and 2nd and that's no coincidence: they are / were pro tour worthy and age-wise still in their prime.
You should ask yourself why the riders that took top positions were both ex-pro tour road riders, and why did they win so little when it they had a well-paid pro-tour contract and aren't on the road anymore? It's not because they had the choice of staying.
What else than semi-pro enthusiasts are guys like Kongstad, Havik, Svendsen, De Marchi, MvElveen and Johnson, all in the top 10? They have sponsors but we can't say they earn big money with riding a bike. Some of them are riding continental, some have ridden pro continental, even fewer were pro tour trainee.
Would you call them pro? or semi-pro non-enthusiasts? They obviously ride races like unbound because they like the adventure and stories they can tell, more than the paycheck they receive for riding it.
In the end, you may say that those that were present and competing are the righty winners, and those that didn't show up shouldn't be mentioned as potential winners. But I wasn't the one starting this by claiming "Exceptional and the "amateur" band-aid on gravel is seriously ripped off" while it's clearly still a race for afficionados and the occasional pro, not having the depth of field to say this is representative of a top gravel starting field.
ps: GvA may be ex-pro tour and that's obviously a better reference for him, but effectively, at this moment he is also just a semi pro enthusiast.