I've wondered about this alot but how would riders careers be managed differently if cycling wasn't so short term minded in terms of sponsors and results?
I feel like Lefevre is able to manage his riders better because of his budget and not having a lack of options for wins but other teams don't have that luxury. For example on the younger end I feel like Sagan is over-raced a lot due to the teams lack of other options and on the older end Evans would be better served at his age focusing on hilly one days and one week races but because of BMC's lack of GT options he's pushed into a role he will likely only continue to get worse at.
I feel like Lefevre is able to manage his riders better because of his budget and not having a lack of options for wins but other teams don't have that luxury. For example on the younger end I feel like Sagan is over-raced a lot due to the teams lack of other options and on the older end Evans would be better served at his age focusing on hilly one days and one week races but because of BMC's lack of GT options he's pushed into a role he will likely only continue to get worse at.