I've posted similar things after previous Tours, but I think this warrants repeating annually ...
Matthew Keenan is freakin' outstanding.
Commentating cycling is so different to every other sport I can think of, because of the range of paces it requires, that it must be incredibly difficult to do well. e.g Five hours of gentle, quiet, county-cricket type commentary where very little happens, followed by five minutes of frantic action like commentating a horse race.
When it's slow-paced, he is interesting, perceptive and easy to listen to. When it's hectic, he speaks clearly and (most importantly) is accurate with his descriptions of the action and rider identification. It's a shame we don't get to hear him at the end of stages more often (but I guess that's a topic for the Phil and Paul thread).
If you read this Matt, then thanks again for another great three weeks.
Matthew Keenan is freakin' outstanding.
Commentating cycling is so different to every other sport I can think of, because of the range of paces it requires, that it must be incredibly difficult to do well. e.g Five hours of gentle, quiet, county-cricket type commentary where very little happens, followed by five minutes of frantic action like commentating a horse race.
When it's slow-paced, he is interesting, perceptive and easy to listen to. When it's hectic, he speaks clearly and (most importantly) is accurate with his descriptions of the action and rider identification. It's a shame we don't get to hear him at the end of stages more often (but I guess that's a topic for the Phil and Paul thread).
If you read this Matt, then thanks again for another great three weeks.