The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
I did not see his posts as trolling, then again my definition is obviously not the same as management.Benotti69 said:What thread was sniper 'trolling'?.
sir fly said:I've just seen BlurryVII is suspended.
Can I lodge an appeal?
In fact, I think "a great Tour abolition" towards everybody affected by some short-term bans would be a nice gesture.
Their passion for cycling has brought them suspensions, remember, and preventing them from discussing the greatest event of their beloved sport would be a torture more than a disciplinary measure.
Please.
He'll miss the weekend stages.BigMac said:sir fly said:I've just seen BlurryVII is suspended.
Can I lodge an appeal?
In fact, I think "a great Tour abolition" towards everybody affected by some short-term bans would be a nice gesture.
Their passion for cycling has brought them suspensions, remember, and preventing them from discussing the greatest event of their beloved sport would be a torture more than a disciplinary measure.
Please.
He's only banned three days...
Armchair cyclist said:We just went 7 days (and 44 minutes) without a suspension: is this a record?
sir fly said:I've just seen BlurryVII is suspended.
Can I lodge an appeal?
In fact, I think "a great Tour abolition" towards everybody affected by some short-term bans would be a nice gesture.
Their passion for cycling has brought them suspensions, remember, and preventing them from discussing the greatest event of their beloved sport would be a torture more than a disciplinary measure.
Please.
You know you're unique, RhD.RedheadDane said:sir fly said:I've just seen BlurryVII is suspended.
Can I lodge an appeal?
In fact, I think "a great Tour abolition" towards everybody affected by some short-term bans would be a nice gesture.
Their passion for cycling has brought them suspensions, remember, and preventing them from discussing the greatest event of their beloved sport would be a torture more than a disciplinary measure.
Please.
You know... it is possible to be passionate for cycling and still follow the forum-rules. I should know.
One would think this would be an incentive to, you know, not get banned in the first place. And please don't speak for all of us. Some of us dread the chaos created by the Tour, and the increased volume of posts means replying to the same point over and over whenever anything controversial happens, because conversation moves too fast for the next poster to have seen the last time the same question was raised or argument presented.sir fly said:He'll miss the weekend stages.BigMac said:sir fly said:I've just seen BlurryVII is suspended.
Can I lodge an appeal?
In fact, I think "a great Tour abolition" towards everybody affected by some short-term bans would be a nice gesture.
Their passion for cycling has brought them suspensions, remember, and preventing them from discussing the greatest event of their beloved sport would be a torture more than a disciplinary measure.
Please.
He's only banned three days...
We're all anxious to see the beginning and express our first impressions. It's when the euphoria reaches maximum.
No, I'm not speaking for all of us. it's my personal appeal.Libertine Seguros said:One would think this would be an incentive to, you know, not get banned in the first place. And please don't speak for all of us. Some of us dread the chaos created by the Tour, and the increased volume of posts means replying to the same point over and over whenever anything controversial happens, because conversation moves too fast for the next poster to have seen the last time the same question was raised or argument presented.sir fly said:He'll miss the weekend stages.BigMac said:sir fly said:I've just seen BlurryVII is suspended.
Can I lodge an appeal?
In fact, I think "a great Tour abolition" towards everybody affected by some short-term bans would be a nice gesture.
Their passion for cycling has brought them suspensions, remember, and preventing them from discussing the greatest event of their beloved sport would be a torture more than a disciplinary measure.
Please.
He's only banned three days...
We're all anxious to see the beginning and express our first impressions. It's when the euphoria reaches maximum.
Your personal appeal reads "We're all anxious...".sir fly said:No, I'm not speaking for all of us. it's my personal appeal.Libertine Seguros said:One would think this would be an incentive to, you know, not get banned in the first place. And please don't speak for all of us. Some of us dread the chaos created by the Tour, and the increased volume of posts means replying to the same point over and over whenever anything controversial happens, because conversation moves too fast for the next poster to have seen the last time the same question was raised or argument presented.sir fly said:He'll miss the weekend stages.BigMac said:sir fly said:I've just seen BlurryVII is suspended.
Can I lodge an appeal?
In fact, I think "a great Tour abolition" towards everybody affected by some short-term bans would be a nice gesture.
Their passion for cycling has brought them suspensions, remember, and preventing them from discussing the greatest event of their beloved sport would be a torture more than a disciplinary measure.
Please.
He's only banned three days...
We're all anxious to see the beginning and express our first impressions. It's when the euphoria reaches maximum.
And regarding the chaos created by the Tour... Well, I'd recommend you to ignore redundant topics and reply to posts you find worth of answering. You'll surely have meaningful and coherent discussion, since there's plenty of members here on the same page with you.
Aren't we all anxious?Libertine Seguros said:Your personal appeal reads "We're all anxious...".
Anyway, it's not so much about ignoring redundant topics, but when a relevant incident happens, everybody's two cents get in the way of everybody else's two cents. Take the Stelvio neutralization controversy in the 2014 Giro, or Porte and Clarke's wheel-swap, Renshaw being thrown off the Tour for headbutting people and being a colossal tool, Cav crashing into Heinrich Haussler, Cancellara picking and choosing when teams should be allowed to race in the 2010 Tour. When incidents like this happen, conversation becomes chaos because there will be multiple topics, and when you think it's all been put to bed, somebody who has joined the conversation late but it's been moving too fast for them to be able to catch up will come and say "hey everybody, has nobody considered...?" or "shouldn't X or Y be punished?" despite that what they've just said has been considered multiple times or debunked several times. That's not the fault of the latecomer, but it does get pretty frustrating. Especially if, like me, you like to fully flesh out your points, meaning that by the time you finish a post you're a couple of pages behind the argument.
Uhmmm, this is not the thread to discuss Chris Froome.thehog said:Has anyone considered Chris Froome might be doping? His transformation back in 2011 was fairy big, yes? Any thoughts?
I don't either.Jspear said:What is up with people and creating sockpuppets? I mean really, they all know it ends in a perma ban. I don't get it.
Jspear said:What is up with people and creating sockpuppets? I mean really, they all know it ends in a perma ban. I don't get it.
Irondan said:I don't either.Jspear said:What is up with people and creating sockpuppets? I mean really, they all know it ends in a perma ban. I don't get it.
I was pretty disappointed when I saw that BlurryVII couldn't wait another day.
The AC thread will suffer because of his impatience.
Jspear said:What is up with people and creating sockpuppets? I mean really, they all know it ends in a perma ban. I don't get it.