Moderators

Page 172 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Aug 5, 2012
2,290
0
0
LaFlorecita said:
Oh so now it was a troll post? So why didn't I receive an infraction for trolling? I'm sorry, but I think I am the one to decide whether my post is baiting or worded to provoke. You're clutching at straws and you know it.

hiero2 said:
However, just to answer the implied question/accusation - I don't see the "bait". He's expressing an opinion. There is no way to prove or disprove it

Mods are taking the pish
 
May 15, 2011
45,171
617
24,680
Last edited by Netserk; Today at 20:57. Reason: Eshnar told you to stop....

Maybe eshnar should be clearer who should stop what! A comment "I told you to stop" between 100 other posts really helps :rolleyes:

Besides, it's bull**** airstream can't be called out for being a troll. And that says a lot. One can only hope he isn't like this irl. Zam made a valid point about airstream, who acts all innocent like he doesn't understand why people say he bashes Contador. Zam makes a point about airstream once saying Alberto should get shot in the head. And I can't react to that point? What a bull**** moderation. Lol. Woops I said bull****, will I receive an infraction again? Bull**** bull**** bull****.
 
Apr 30, 2011
47,147
29,774
28,180
Judged by all those that defended him when I banned him, you'd have to think that he is as pure as an angel.
 
Mar 24, 2011
10,525
1,923
25,680
LaFlorecita said:
Last edited by Netserk; Today at 20:57. Reason: Eshnar told you to stop....

Maybe eshnar should be clearer who should stop what! A comment "I told you to stop" between 100 other posts really helps :rolleyes:

Besides, it's bull**** airstream can't be called out for being a troll. And that says a lot. One can only hope he isn't like this irl. Zam made a valid point about airstream, who acts all innocent like he doesn't understand why people say he bashes Contador. Zam makes a point about airstream once saying Alberto should get shot in the head. And I can't react to that point? What a bull**** moderation. Lol. Woops I said bull****, will I receive an infraction again? Bull**** bull**** bull****.
'I told you to stop' didn't need anything else, since I already gave a warning just a page earlier. I'm sure you didn't struggle too much to find out what I meant.
 
Mar 10, 2009
6,158
1
0
Netserk said:
Judged by all those that defended him when I banned him, you'd have to think that he is as pure as an angel.

Where does that leave you, based on the comments on you here in this thread?
 
May 15, 2011
45,171
617
24,680
Eshnar said:
'I told you to stop' didn't need anything else, since I already gave a warning just a page earlier. I'm sure you didn't struggle too much to find out what I meant.

To me it was not clear your warning was directed at zams post
 
May 15, 2011
45,171
617
24,680
Netserk said:
Judged by all those that defended him when I banned him, you'd have to think that he is as pure as an angel.

What does that tell you about the popularity of the mods? ;)
 
Mar 24, 2011
10,525
1,923
25,680
LaFlorecita said:
To me it was not clear your warning was directed at zams post
it was directed to the last 10 posts or so, whose subject was the trolling accusation.
 
Jul 10, 2010
2,906
1
0
LaFlorecita said:
. . .
Besides, it's bull**** airstream can't be called out for being a troll. And that says a lot. . . . What a bull**** moderation. Lol. Woops I said bull****, will I receive an infraction again? Bull**** bull**** bull****.

Fair question. From me, to you, I could care less about someone using bullpuckey language. But when the only point of a post is to inflame and provoke, and I see it? It'll be gone. And if I think you are smart enough to know better, you'll get an infraction. Controversial opinions are fine. Fighting isn't.
-----
 
May 15, 2011
45,171
617
24,680
hiero2 said:
Fair question. From me, to you, I could care less about someone using bullpuckey language. But when the only point of a post is to inflame and provoke, and I see it? It'll be gone. And if I think you are smart enough to know better, you'll get an infraction. Controversial opinions are fine. Fighting isn't.
-----

To be ****ing honest, worse posts can be found all across the forum. Trolls galore. The forum has gone down the drain. Why don't you do something about that, instead of picking an easy target. The only point of my post was to inflame and provoke? No, it was to express frustration about some of the ridiculous opinions on this forum.

There is no equality here. Lots of cherry picking going on. And what's worse is that the mods aren't open for criticism at all. And they're trolling and postings off topic posts all across the forum. Why don't you do something about that, instead of moderating silly posts no one will take seriously anyway?
 
Jun 14, 2010
34,930
60
22,580
Parrulo said:
I used those videos because they were short and had the exact sentences i wanted, not because they had quality.

And i still don't like wrestling, i only like the funny trash talking guys like the rock do.

Anyway from what i can tell from the youtube videos the crowds have been getting worse with each year. From the crowd finishing all of the rocks catch phrases in the early 00's to barely getting a pop when he made his return :eek: Also you can spot 5 year olds booing him with Cena shirts lol

Same for everyone else. I was watching the video of Y2J's debut a few weeks ago and one of the suggested videos by youtube was his return in 2012 or 2013 (i didn't even knew he had left :eek:) and the crowd barely reacted.
Yeah the fans were much better back in the attitude era. Even grannies were shouting all the catchphrases.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WdsBbonKJ3U&t=1m57s

To be fair with Jericho though the first time his debut had a massive buildup with the whole y2j computer screens and it was possibly the best debut ever. He also had an awessome reception when he came back the 2nd time with similar buildup back in 07 i think. Havent seen any since then but obviously wont be the same.
 
Sep 30, 2011
9,560
9
17,495
LaFlorecita said:
To be ****ing honest, worse posts can be found all across the forum. Trolls galore. The forum has gone down the drain. Why don't you do something about that, instead of picking an easy target. The only point of my post was to inflame and provoke? No, it was to express frustration about some of the ridiculous opinions on this forum.

There is no equality here. Lots of cherry picking going on. And what's worse is that the mods aren't open for criticism at all. And they're trolling and postings off topic posts all across the forum. Why don't you do something about that, instead of moderating silly posts no one will take seriously anyway?

I will have you know that People take all my post seriously.


:p
 
Mar 25, 2013
5,389
0
0
The Hitch said:
Yeah the fans were much better back in the attitude era. Even grannies were shouting all the catchphrases.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WdsBbonKJ3U&t=1m57s

To be fair with Jericho though the first time his debut had a massive buildup with the whole y2j computer screens and it was possibly the best debut ever. He also had an awessome reception when he came back the 2nd time with similar buildup back in 07 i think. Havent seen any since then but obviously wont be the same.

If memory serves me right he had a rivalry with Chyna at the start and the whole Y2J concept was to save the whole WWF at the time. He was introduced as a heel but the crowd and fans instantly took to him and had to be changed not long afterwards to a face. Those were the days. The attitude era was introduced due to WCW winning week after week in the Monday Night wars between RAW and Nitro. Vince's best idea by far. Saved the organisation and ended Bischoff, Russo and WCW.
 
Jul 10, 2010
2,906
1
0
LaFlorecita said:
To be ****ing honest, worse posts can be found all across the forum. Trolls galore. The forum has gone down the drain. Why don't you do something about that, instead of picking an easy target. The only point of my post was to inflame and provoke? No, it was to express frustration about some of the ridiculous opinions on this forum.

There is no equality here. Lots of cherry picking going on. And what's worse is that the mods aren't open for criticism at all. And they're trolling and postings off topic posts all across the forum. Why don't you do something about that, instead of moderating silly posts no one will take seriously anyway?

Well, as I see it, you have two choices. Work with me, or work against me. If you find posts you think are worse, refer to Nets' solution - report it. If you decide to work against me, I will employ the blackcat ellipsis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

and dot you into submission! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 
Jul 10, 2010
2,906
1
0
I'm glad I was dancing last night - and in a good mood! Well - if I hadn't been, I probably wouldn't have replied at all, to avoid saying anything I might regret.

But, you know, there is an interesting point here. LaFlo points out that she is the one with "intent" - not the words. Which is true.

But once the words leave our lips (virtually, when you hit the submit button, you know what I mean), since they stay here when we are not here, they take on a life of their own. They stand there, all alone, with you asleep or otherwise engaged elsewhere, and the reader must take them at face value. If they do not communicate the intended message, then we have not left the proper set of words, have we.

So, fire them, and hire a new batch - or support them and add extra staff. They have to speak clearly when we are away.
 
Aug 5, 2012
2,290
0
0
Zam_Olyas said:
Holy San Pietro!! Hiero2, you say a lot of stuff. :p

I actually posted a response to something he said ITT yesterday but decided to delete it as I didn't have a spare half hour to read his response.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.