Moderators

Page 340 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Status
Not open for further replies.
the sceptic said:
Fair enough, Ill try to update my ignore list.

ebandit, I dont know why you are on a crusade against me, but you may see im not the only one calling out suckpuppets. Perhaps you should call them soulless nazis too.

Because you sour the forum. .....Most of your posts are snide digs........you are one of the main reasons I and others have mostly given up and gone....you know it....you admitted to me the other day that you were due a lengthy ban.....you know what you are doing


Mark L
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
ebandit said:
Because you sour the forum. .....Most of your posts are snide digs........you are one of the main reasons I and others have mostly given up and gone....you know it....you admitted to me the other day that you were due a lengthy ban.....you know what you are doing


Mark L

Well i am sorry if you gave up on the forum because of me Mark. I will try to de-sour my posts in the future. (this is not a snide dig)
 
Apr 3, 2009
12,592
8,447
28,180
King Boonen said:
Is accusing new posters of being a sock puppet acceptable? Because it now just seems to be a way to sneer and not actually involve yourself in a discussion you don't want to have.

No, it's not. But the sock puppets have been reported, and aren't being dealt with, so from this side it gets frustrating, even though I understand the mods don't want to ban people unless they can prove it via IP.

it's a way of letting the troll know why you don't bother responding in a respectful or meaningful way to the trolling and letting other posters know that they might want to pass on it as well.

I'll take my lumps for doing it, but be sure, I do report them multiple times before commenting in a thread about it. Make sense?
 

laurel1969

BANNED
Aug 21, 2014
423
2
0
ebandit said:
You are scared of 'him'.....because he can see into your empty soul......deep down you know this...

.....but Laurel isn't 'him'....Laurel ignores you.....You-know-who wouldn't...

Mark L

Seeing as how you are mentioning me by name would you mind telling me who I am not just so I can go and read their posts and find out where I'm going wrong..err..or is it right.

Interestingly the sockpuppet/troll accusations are coming from only 3 people and on the same thread (or maybe two) and nowhere else.

Maybe that says something about the accusers own agenda and intentions with regards to stifling opinions they don't like.
 
Apr 3, 2009
12,592
8,447
28,180
laurel1969 said:
Seeing as how you are mentioning me by name would you mind telling me who I am not just so I can go and read their posts and find out where I'm going wrong..err..or is it right.

Interestingly the sockpuppet/troll accusations are coming from only 3 people and on the same thread (or maybe two) and nowhere else.

Maybe that says something about the accusers own agenda and intentions with regards to stifling opinions they don't like.

Or maybe it means we've been around long enough and seen enough of the sock-puppetry to spot it pretty quickly when it happens. And that your "view" (please don't tell me anyone seriously believes that you are arguing in good faith) that it's about agendas and stifling opinion has as much validity as your renewed presence here.

Opposing opinion well stated? Bring it on. We all get smarter from those kinds of discussions.

One might easily say that because you can't effectively make a case for your opinions (whatever they might be today, I can't keep track) you resort to cries of "stifling" and "agendas".

If you wanted to return to the forum, there is an acceptable path. Simply let the mods know you want an end to your ban, articulate the reasons why you should be let back, and ask them to watch you closely. Discuss with them why you were banned and what you need to do to stay un-banned moving forward.

Of course all of that assumes you are here in good faith. Which I hope is the case. I recommend you do what I suggest above. You'll get less flak from the other members who see exactly what you're doing, and will have more productive discussions. If that's what you're looking for.
 

laurel1969

BANNED
Aug 21, 2014
423
2
0
red_flanders said:
bla bla bla

Interesting.

Who was I again?

Why are there no accusations from posters on other threads I post on?

I think, red Flanders, perhaps it is you that is the real troll.
 
Apr 3, 2009
12,592
8,447
28,180
laurel1969 said:
Interesting. Who was I again?

Why are there no accusations from posters on other threads I post on?

I think, red Flanders, perhaps it is you that is the real troll.

Ok then. Do continue on.
 
May 2, 2010
1,692
0
0
laurel1969 said:
Interesting.

Who was I again?

Why are there no accusations from posters on other threads I post on?

I think, red Flanders, perhaps it is you that is the real troll.

I don't believe I've conversed with you on threads. I think you're a sockpuppet. Why? You seem to have an astounding knowledge of the forums posters history & ban history.
 

laurel1969

BANNED
Aug 21, 2014
423
2
0
Uh durr....its a f'kin public forum with access to eveybodies post history in their profiles and in the threads and a specific thread detailing bans and reasons.

But actually I've read very little historical stuff here. You won't find any evidence to back up your vague claim because there isn't any.

So, I was at it hammer and tongs on the World and US politics threads. Where are the accusations there? Why is it only from the Skyobsessives? Who was it I'm supposed to have been or still am?
 
May 5, 2010
51,682
30,227
28,180
red_flanders said:
Opposing opinion well stated? Bring it on. We all get smarter from those kinds of discussions.

In fact that kinda what makes a discussion. Otherwise it'll just be a bunch of people agreeing with each other and that makes for rather boring discussions.
 
Aug 9, 2014
412
0
0
laurel1969 said:
Uh durr....its a f'kin public forum with access to eveybodies post history in their profiles and in the threads and a specific thread detailing bans and reasons.

But actually I've read very little historical stuff here. You won't find any evidence to back up your vague claim because there isn't any.

So, I was at it hammer and tongs on the World and US politics threads. Where are the accusations there? Why is it only from the Skyobsessives? Who was it I'm supposed to have been or still am?

I agree that accusing other posters 'in thread' gums up threads. Not sure why mods allow it.

I dunno, seems like everyone who disagrees with me here then calls me a sock. I reported the posts and the mods did nothing. So I put said accusers on ignore.
 
Jul 5, 2012
2,878
1
11,485
Cant be bothered quoting so many posts so here's a wrap:

1) It is not appreciated by anyone to call other members sockpuppets, especially in a general thread as part of a discussion

2) report suspicions in private to a mod or report posts, and let the mods deal with it

3) Mods are well aware of whats going on, taking time to deal with it is part of the system...."enough rope" ring a bell? And while they are puppeteering, they are known instead of a plague of locusts

4) Use the "ignore" feature

5) Most long term members can spot sockpuppets a mile away

6) Careful what you ask for laurel1969 - see (3)

7) you don't know if mods "do nothing". They do plenty, mostly in the background. Its only when it comes to the fore it gets known, and then the board lights up with denigration

cheers
bison
 
Aug 9, 2014
412
0
0
sittingbison said:
7) you don't know if mods "do nothing". They do plenty, mostly in the background. Its only when it comes to the fore it gets known, and then the board lights up with denigration

cheers
bison

Apoligies. Sorry I overlooking the in-the-background work.

I'll keep reporting it when people call me a sock.
 
Apr 3, 2009
12,592
8,447
28,180
sittingbison said:
Cant be bothered quoting so many posts so here's a wrap:

1) It is not appreciated by anyone to call other members sockpuppets, especially in a general thread as part of a discussion

2) report suspicions in private to a mod or report posts, and let the mods deal with it

3) Mods are well aware of whats going on, taking time to deal with it is part of the system...."enough rope" ring a bell? And while they are puppeteering, they are known instead of a plague of locusts

4) Use the "ignore" feature

5) Most long term members can spot sockpuppets a mile away

6) Careful what you ask for laurel1969 - see (3)

7) you don't know if mods "do nothing". They do plenty, mostly in the background. Its only when it comes to the fore it gets known, and then the board lights up with denigration

cheers
bison

All seems smart, prudent and it's good to hear what you guys are thinking. Thank you for the response.
 

laurel1969

BANNED
Aug 21, 2014
423
2
0
red_flanders said:
All seems smart, prudent and it's good to hear what you guys are thinking. Thank you for the response.

Could you get your tongue any further up the moderator's a$$ even if you tried?

Eww.
 
Feb 20, 2010
33,064
15,272
28,180
I know the account will get permabanned and all posts deleted as soon as it's picked up, but please somebody in the moderation team get online and shut down that Korean BMW spambot.
 
Jul 11, 2013
3,340
0
0
Probably been asked before..

But A limit of 2 started threads per day, should help minimize the problem a bit.. I dunno how your system works but it should be able to seperate a normal post from a started thread and create a limit?
Cheers
 
Feb 29, 2012
5,765
717
19,680
Libertine Seguros said:
I know the account will get permabanned and all posts deleted as soon as it's picked up, but please somebody in the moderation team get online and shut down that Korean BMW spambot.

It is funny that this bot missed the most active part of the forum. :p
 
Mar 24, 2011
10,525
1,923
25,680
Libertine Seguros said:
I know the account will get permabanned and all posts deleted as soon as it's picked up, but please somebody in the moderation team get online and shut down that Korean BMW spambot.
It's been like this for two straight days now. Is it korean? I thought it was chinese :eek:
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
RownhamHill said:
Does it prove your point?

Sadly, yes. Traffic is already way down. Eventually it will turn into a spambot wasteland. This is what happens when the forum is run by mods who get high on power and chase away the good contributors.
 
Feb 29, 2012
5,765
717
19,680
Eshnar said:
It's been like this for two straight days now. Is it korean? I thought it was chinese :eek:

The link was like F1BMW.kr or something like that. FYI, korean and chinese letters are very different. (I perfectly understand that if you think they are all same. :p)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.