most people who frequent this site already dislike the changes and now im beginning to see why the changes were made.
-since the changes there has been so little news!!
-before, there were 3 reports packed with stories. Now we get about 3 stories unless a major tour is on.
-the tech hasnt seen a new review in over a month! the latest features are also over 1 month old! the only thing new in tech is eurobike (thank god!)
this is pathetic. the Vuelta is now on, so there should be no shortage of tech features to be done.
The changes to the site are obvious. Less need for news. more pages to be viewed = more advertising revenue. Was creating seperate pages for cyclocross, MTB, track worth the money? because ur gonna be losing more from frustrated readers leaving the site.
the entire layout of the new site is ridiculous. there isnt enough road news let alone track or cyclocross. Separating them all has been a disaster. The layout hides the fact that there has been less news then before and i wish cyclingnews would go back to the old layout and the old style of reporting.
-since the changes there has been so little news!!
-before, there were 3 reports packed with stories. Now we get about 3 stories unless a major tour is on.
-the tech hasnt seen a new review in over a month! the latest features are also over 1 month old! the only thing new in tech is eurobike (thank god!)
this is pathetic. the Vuelta is now on, so there should be no shortage of tech features to be done.
The changes to the site are obvious. Less need for news. more pages to be viewed = more advertising revenue. Was creating seperate pages for cyclocross, MTB, track worth the money? because ur gonna be losing more from frustrated readers leaving the site.
the entire layout of the new site is ridiculous. there isnt enough road news let alone track or cyclocross. Separating them all has been a disaster. The layout hides the fact that there has been less news then before and i wish cyclingnews would go back to the old layout and the old style of reporting.