New test for blood transfusion - can trace people using their own blood!

Page 3 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Re:

blackcat said:
dont forget testing samples in future, back-testing. like say, 1999 Tour de France samples, but not for research purposes.

Like testing the entirety of 2007 for Myacera, and not just picking on Ricky Riccio and Saunier Duval.

back testing, never happens, the sport authorities dont wanna catch you.

<Brecht quote on heroes>

<Professor Don Catlin on his research testing for the track and field trials for the LA 1984 Olympics, and allowing athletes a "wide berth" to prepare for international meets>

If I could count how many times they've announced they would do backtesting just to get people to calm down, and then waited for the public to forget about it...
 
Mar 13, 2009
16,853
2
0
Re: Re:

GuyIncognito said:
If I could count how many times they've announced they would do backtesting just to get people to calm down, and then waited for the public to forget about it...

they may actually do it when they wish to stiff you, if you are without any political influence, and like Landis, with his Mercury Viatel monies in escrow, Landis pissing off the UCI,

so yeah, once in a blue moon and pigs flying, they may do some retrospective testing.

will they even go over Usain Bolt's metabolites with a blue light? Or Steve Redgrave's? no fark!n chance
 
Jan 16, 2013
49
0
0
Re:

gooner said:
A 2011 study showed small, frequent (and effective) doses of EPO didn’t trigger alarms. And antidoping scientists fear that athletes can use other drugs to tweak blood levels and fool the test.

Pitsiladis, whose background is in genetics, thinks the secret to a foolproof test may lie inside cellular anatomy. He spent years picking through the DNA of East African runners, looking for a source to their prowess. But he couldn’t find a genetic cause. In fact, he started to wonder if they were just doping, and that suspicion led him to search for evidence of cheating on a genetic level, specifically in RNA.

RNA attaches to DNA and executes its code, to produce proteins the body needs to grow and function. If the body has been fooled into making more blood cells, the RNA should reveal it. To check his theory, Pitsiladis had to do some doping of his own. In Scotland and Kenya, he and colleagues drew blood from runners, then had them inject EPO and checked their blood several more times over a month. He plugged that blood into a machine that looks like an oversize CD player and scans for 47,000 RNA sequences, measuring how much of each one is present in the sample.

The results showed unique fluctuations in more than 100 RNA sequences in the doped blood. Pitsiladis likens it to a dimmer switch. Hit with a dose of EPO, the body responds by turning up or down the expression of certain genes. Some fragments of RNA were 16 times more plentiful in the doped blood. He could still find this fingerprint four weeks after the injection. “Most exciting data of my career,” Pitsiladis said.

Catching someone doping with their own blood can be trickier. But in Umea, Sweden, 250 miles south of the Arctic Circle, Christer Malm thinks he might have found a way. He extracted blood from 11 people, froze it for 15 weeks and then reinjected it. When comparing these samples to normal blood, Malm could always pick the doped blood out of a lineup by looking for unusual amounts of certain proteins. He suspects the changes are caused by the body’s reaction to the new blood, combined with a sort of freezer burn that develops as the blood ages.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/02/magazine/the-secret-to-a-bulletproof-antidoping-test.html?&_r=0

Followed up today:
http://road.cc/content/news/185234-anti-doping-scientist-claims-hed-have-caught-lance-armstrong