Re: Re:
If Nibali was trying to chase back on after a mechanical, or was getting bottles then you can be certain that the rest of the peleton wouldn't have batted an eyelid.
It also comes back to when and why. Nibali was working with a large group to get back on after the crash. The team car gave him a big advantage over the rest of the chasers who were also working hard.Afrank said:mrhender said:The discussion reminds me of this quote:
"If you’re a cheat, you're a cheat, you're not half a cheat. You wouldn't say, 'I'll cheat here but I'm not going to cheat over there; I'll cheat on a Monday but not on a Tuesday.'
To be sure, I'am not all all using it as evidence just stating that I thought of the quote.
Could there be some truth in it?
Maybe in some cases -but it is not something I would call an universal truth.
Cycling is known for the "they all do/did it" discourse.
I wonder how riders perceive this kind of cheating as opposed to doping.
Maybe they feel the same way about it..
That's a question any good journalist would ask first thing.
My guess is that many riders would use the "it happens all the time" excuse to justify holding onto a car or bottle for too long (as a way to show that it isn't giving them and advantage and thus isn't cheating) just as it has been used to justify doping in the past.
If Nibali was trying to chase back on after a mechanical, or was getting bottles then you can be certain that the rest of the peleton wouldn't have batted an eyelid.