It always happens in big races as well. If not an exchange of cash an exchange of favors is the best way for a rider/team to get support when a race better suits their strengths. You see it often when a sprinter's team is inexplicably setting tempo on a flat interlude before a mountain finish, saving the energy of an opponent's domestiques that can climb.Mambo95 said:Sure it still happens. It always has done. I doubt it happens much in the big races though, as the sponsors invest much more these days. And I think the currency is more 'favours' these days, rather than cash (e.g. Contador riding for Valverde in the 2009 Dauphine)
At a much lower level, on one of the Real Peloton podcasts, Dean Downing told a few amusing stories about riding kermesses in Belgium.
Yeah - support, sure - what I meant you can't buy a win any more in a big race. There are plenty of rumours about the olden days about big races being bought (e.g. Simpson v Altig at the 1965 Worlds is one that has persisted)Oldman said:It always happens in big races as well. If not an exchange of cash an exchange of favors is the best way for a rider/team to get support when a race better suits their strengths. You see it often when a sprinter's team is inexplicably setting tempo on a flat interlude before a mountain finish, saving the energy of an opponent's domestiques that can climb.
Is it cheating or part of a time honored tradition of reciprocal "sportsmanship"? We've all chased riders we don't like because we don't want them to succeed, at all costs.
I'd generally agree except when a DS knows he has no hope and thinks he can offer his teams services during a race. That would not mean giving up a placing, since they didn't have a shot; but could mean directly benefitting another team for whatever reason. Having said that the other DS's would also know something was up and could find a way to retaliate. That starts getting into gamesmanship that major sponsorship wouldn't appreciate knowing about unless they get the wins.Mambo95 said:Yeah - support, sure - what I meant you can't buy a win any more in a big race. There are plenty of rumours about the olden days about big races being bought (e.g. Simpson v Altig at the 1965 Worlds is one that has persisted)
A Vuelta stage is a big race'.Mambo95 said:Yeah - support, sure - what I meant you can't buy a win any more in a big race. There are plenty of rumours about the olden days about big races being bought (e.g. Simpson v Altig at the 1965 Worlds is one that has persisted)
“He turned to me with three kilometre to go as said “How much ?”. I just shook my head and said no there was no way I was going to consider giving away a stage no matter how much he was willing to pay me and there was no more talking about it. That was it.
Yes, it is pretty blatant in the film.Sanitiser said:The 'favours' thing is most transparent in 'Overcoming'. It is strongly alluded to that Armstrong gives the win to Basso for his mother and then the next day Basso gives the stage to Armstrong as a favour, with Bjarne *****ing.
If it wasn't such a big deal for Kreuziger or Liquigas why make the offer then?Mambo95 said:To my mind, not particularly. Not to someone riding for GC on a big team like Liquigas like Kreuziger was. They have bigger fish to fry.
"At five kilometres from the finish, he came alongside me and asked for money to give me the stage win".
With 50 kms to go, Bennati came up to me and said: "You're going to have to pay me a lot of money if you want to win this stage or you will never win, because I will chase you down. There's no way you're going anywhere without me."
Ok, I misread the quote. However, when I posted I genuinely wasn't thinking about GT stages (Really, I wasn't. I was thinking of bigger things such as classics and other big one day races.)Dr. Maserati said:If it wasn't such a big deal for Kreuziger or Liquigas why make the offer then?
Really informative. Thankstheswordsman said:In the paper presented at the New Pathways Conference last Fall, Australian riders talked about guys in the breakaway buying and selling stage wins.
Q: Somebody said to us you can’t win the Tour without friends.
A: Absolutely not possible and that has been Cadel’s biggest problem too; not
having enough friends. It is a fact of life. He hasn’t gone out of his way to make
friends. Phil Anderson was the same. He could have had five times the amount of
victories that he had. If you look at the results, go and look on cycling.com and
look at all the classics and go through classics season. Have a look at the past.
Some of them give top threes from the seventies and the eighties, not just the
winner. Have a look how many placing
Phil Anderson got. Every single classic
he run top five over and over again. He only won Amstel Gold Race and
something else because he was never allowed to win. He just didn’t have enough
friends, yet he was there every race. Cadel is much the same. He is good enough
to be there but his internal politics haven’t been good enough. So many people
want him to not win compared to - he has respect and deserves to win, which
makes his worlds victory even greater because he just smashed them. He was the
best and good on him. Hopefully it will give him a bit more respect.
I can't see any irony in that. But still its interesting, I geuss many of the riders who started it all back in the 1890s were such poor b*st*rds its understandable that they took the money wherever it came from.Chuffy said:It's one of the great ironies that in cycling, buying off an opponent was all part of the game. In football it's called 'match-fixing'...
that is certainly not the case all the time.Chuffy said:It's one of the great ironies that in cycling, buying off an opponent was all part of the game. In football it's called 'match-fixing'...
In my opinion: working together for different goals (usual GC and stage) is something really different then buying with money of favours at other races.Libertine Seguros said:There's a lot of 'favours' going around. Always has been, always will be.
After the Angliru stage of the 2008 Vuelta, the next stage featured a mountaintop finish at the Puerto de San Isidro. Contador and Valverde had struck a deal to work together and that Valverde would get the win since he'd cracked on Angliru when the two (and Joaquím Rodríguez) had left everybody behind, and having given up over 3 minutes due to a tactical error on a flat stage Valverde was no GC threat to Contador. However, the attacks of Mosquera broke Valverde again, so Contador and Leipheimer just sat on Mosquera's wheel until about 200m to go before popping out for the win and greatly upsetting Xaco's team brass.
In the 2010 Giro, Nibali, Basso and Scarponi were the front group coming to the Aprica. But the chasing group - including the maglia rosa of David Arroyo - was getting closer thanks to Arroyo's incredible descending. Basso offered Scarponi the stage win in exchange for doing a share of the work - a very shrewd move because it offered Scarponi the carrot of a position on the podium as well as a stage win, whereas Basso also knew that Scarponi would outsprint him and Nibali to the line anyway, so it would be better to have three workers and let Scarponi win (and him get the maglia rosa) than have two workers, have Scarponi win anyway (and him possibly not get the maglia rosa).
Cobblestoned is absolutely adamant that Milram bought Fabian Wegmann's win at the Frankfurt Maitagrennen last year but since that came out of a sprint of a group of 25, there were something like 10 or 11 teams represented in that group, and would have required quite some expenditure for a cash-strapped team.
And of course, Valverde offered Sylwester Szmyd the victory on Mont Ventoux in the Dauphiné in exchange for helping him get the yellow jersey. And Valverde was true to his word, even though he practically had to stop and wait for the Pole in the last hundred metres.
|Thread starter||Similar threads||Forum||Replies||Date|
|A||Riders who curiously did badly in certain types of races||Professional Road Racing||94|
|Jhonatan Narváez - not your typical South American rider||Professional Road Racing||6|
|E||Main rider targets for 2021||Professional Road Racing||17|
|H||2021 rider schedules||Professional Road Racing||193|
|H||Teams & Riders Best rider without a pro win after 3+ seasons in the senior ranks||Professional Road Racing||29|
|Question Best male rider of the year 2020||Professional Road Racing||129|
|F||Riders Complaints About Long, "Hard" Stages||Professional Road Racing||142|
|J||WHY ARE RIDERS HELMETS NOT FITTED WITH IMPACT SENSORS TO RECORD HARD IMPACTS?||Professional Road Racing||4|
|F||Tour de France 2020 | Stage 2 (Nice Haut Pays - Nice, 186 km)||Professional Road Racing||636|
|Riders who curiously did badly in certain types of races|
|Jhonatan Narváez - not your typical South American rider|
|Main rider targets for 2021|
|2021 rider schedules|
|Teams & Riders Best rider without a pro win after 3+ seasons in the senior ranks|
|Question Best male rider of the year 2020|
|Riders Complaints About Long, "Hard" Stages|
|WHY ARE RIDERS HELMETS NOT FITTED WITH IMPACT SENSORS TO RECORD HARD IMPACTS?|
|Tour de France 2020 | Stage 2 (Nice Haut Pays - Nice, 186 km)|