Why is it salient to the reader to know how many reporters did or didn't attend the impromptu press conference given by Christophe Moreau during the rest day?
"Christophe Moreau organised a mini press conference with less than ten reporters attending to announce the end of his career when his contract with Caisse d'Epargne finishes at the end of this year."
It's not, of course, and the only reason that information is published is to humiliate Moreau and present him as being unworthy of attention from the media - a washed-up rider, if you will.
Unfortunately for cyclingnews.com, that's a distinction that should be left to the reader to make, based on factors such as Moreau's age, his results, whether or not a contract has been offered to him for next year... It's NOT the responsibility of your "reporter" to reveal his personal bias and pettiness by gloating over the fact that Moreau's press conference didn't draw the number of reporters as Contador's might have.
And to put that information in the lead only makes it all the more glaringly obvious that the correspondent has an agenda that does not favor the subject of his report.
You all should be ashamed of yourselves for allowing that kind of amateurish ... I don't even want to validate it by calling it reporting - because it's not - ... crap in what is supposed to be a leading cycling news website. Instead of reporting, we get a writer slagging-off Christophe Moreau.
"Christophe Moreau organised a mini press conference with less than ten reporters attending to announce the end of his career when his contract with Caisse d'Epargne finishes at the end of this year."
It's not, of course, and the only reason that information is published is to humiliate Moreau and present him as being unworthy of attention from the media - a washed-up rider, if you will.
Unfortunately for cyclingnews.com, that's a distinction that should be left to the reader to make, based on factors such as Moreau's age, his results, whether or not a contract has been offered to him for next year... It's NOT the responsibility of your "reporter" to reveal his personal bias and pettiness by gloating over the fact that Moreau's press conference didn't draw the number of reporters as Contador's might have.
And to put that information in the lead only makes it all the more glaringly obvious that the correspondent has an agenda that does not favor the subject of his report.
You all should be ashamed of yourselves for allowing that kind of amateurish ... I don't even want to validate it by calling it reporting - because it's not - ... crap in what is supposed to be a leading cycling news website. Instead of reporting, we get a writer slagging-off Christophe Moreau.