The ship is sinking for Dave Brailsford, will he weather the storm?
http://www.cyclingnews.com/features...-only-fuels-further-scepticism/#disqus_thread
http://www.cyclingnews.com/features...-only-fuels-further-scepticism/#disqus_thread
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Yep, and what are the odds that the UKAD report implicates DB as "dirty"? Whatever they are, I'd put money down that he comes up clean....King Boonen said:Honestly, I think he'll get away with it if the UKAD report comes back "clean".
King Boonen said:I'm pretty sure he will, I've basically given up on bike racing as a sport![]()
The mole has already provided everything needed to take the house down. From Matt's writings it is easy to discern that he knows what was in the package and that it wasn't flumicil but an ordinary ped.Electress said:He'll get away with it...there' just not enough of an appetite with TPTB to see Skyfall.
Unless there is a mole who provides something more. I live in hope that this is so.
then maybe look for a forum where that particular issue is tackled.yaco said:Since when does an off the record briefing then becomes part of an article - We worry about the morality of cyclists and sports-people doping, though I am more worried about the morality of journalists.
Yes, but my bet is he'll still resign.King Boonen said:Honestly, I think he'll get away with it if the UKAD report comes back "clean".
sniper said:Yes, but my bet is he'll still resign.King Boonen said:Honestly, I think he'll get away with it if the UKAD report comes back "clean".
He'll get cleared, then resigns.
A bit like Sutton (who effectively got cleared).
Win win.
DFA123 said:sniper said:Yes, but my bet is he'll still resign.King Boonen said:Honestly, I think he'll get away with it if the UKAD report comes back "clean".
He'll get cleared, then resigns.
A bit like Sutton (who effectively got cleared).
Win win.
This. I reckon he'll weather it in the short term and then gradually step out of the limelight next season. Perhaps 'moving upstairs' to some kind of advisory role with less direct accountability.
DFA123 said:This. I reckon he'll weather it in the short term and then gradually step out of the limelight next season. Perhaps 'moving upstairs' to some kind of advisory role with less direct accountability.
sniper said:then maybe look for a forum where that particular issue is tackled.yaco said:Since when does an off the record briefing then becomes part of an article - We worry about the morality of cyclists and sports-people doping, though I am more worried about the morality of journalists.
sniper said:Yes, but my bet is he'll still resign.King Boonen said:Honestly, I think he'll get away with it if the UKAD report comes back "clean".
He'll get cleared, then resigns.
A bit like Sutton (who effectively got cleared).
Win win.
Strange Loop said:DFA123 said:This. I reckon he'll weather it in the short term and then gradually step out of the limelight next season. Perhaps 'moving upstairs' to some kind of advisory role with less direct accountability.
I think this is what's going to happen and it doesn't really matter if he's truly guilty or not. Damaged goods are damaged goods and should be removed from the public eye. It's also what usually happens with people in public places, once their credibility is lost and their persona becomes tainted, they'll step down or out of the limelight, no matter if the actual cause of that loss or taint was legit. Having a good, no, decent reputation is everything in a public position and once you've lost that, you're gone, no matter the cause.
In this case I suspect the cause is legit, though. This story reeks and, with no supporting evidence, I don't buy it.
Ken Matheson@kenem
@Scienceofsport Long statement going back 18yrs re. DB's lies, bullying, harassment, wrongful dismissal of staff, financial misconduct etc..
Electress said:Strange Loop said:DFA123 said:This. I reckon he'll weather it in the short term and then gradually step out of the limelight next season. Perhaps 'moving upstairs' to some kind of advisory role with less direct accountability.
I think this is what's going to happen and it doesn't really matter if he's truly guilty or not. Damaged goods are damaged goods and should be removed from the public eye. It's also what usually happens with people in public places, once their credibility is lost and their persona becomes tainted, they'll step down or out of the limelight, no matter if the actual cause of that loss or taint was legit. Having a good, no, decent reputation is everything in a public position and once you've lost that, you're gone, no matter the cause.
In this case I suspect the cause is legit, though. This story reeks and, with no supporting evidence, I don't buy it.
I would have agreed with you a few years ago, but not now. Not the world of cycling, but look at Keith Vaz and politician of all classes too numerous to mention. People have merely to fade from public life for a bit and hey presto, they are rehabilitated. David Millar seems to have pulled off the 'doper to doping guru' by exploiting the 'redemption' narrative. Unless there's a lot more revealed, I reckon DB will step back temporarily before, as others point out, re-emerging as some kind of go-to-cycling guru, and this will not be mentioned again.
Wiggins I don't think will be untainted by the TUE affair, partly because he hasn't been an Establishment / institutional pet.
I thought he was a mastermind.Benotti69 said:People are starting to talk, as was obvious from jiffybag story leak to Matt Lawton
but others too
Ken Matheson@kenem
@Scienceofsport Long statement going back 18yrs re. DB's lies, bullying, harassment, wrongful dismissal of staff, financial misconduct etc..
Benotti69 said:Electress said:Strange Loop said:DFA123 said:This. I reckon he'll weather it in the short term and then gradually step out of the limelight next season. Perhaps 'moving upstairs' to some kind of advisory role with less direct accountability.
I think this is what's going to happen and it doesn't really matter if he's truly guilty or not. Damaged goods are damaged goods and should be removed from the public eye. It's also what usually happens with people in public places, once their credibility is lost and their persona becomes tainted, they'll step down or out of the limelight, no matter if the actual cause of that loss or taint was legit. Having a good, no, decent reputation is everything in a public position and once you've lost that, you're gone, no matter the cause.
In this case I suspect the cause is legit, though. This story reeks and, with no supporting evidence, I don't buy it.
I would have agreed with you a few years ago, but not now. Not the world of cycling, but look at Keith Vaz and politician of all classes too numerous to mention. People have merely to fade from public life for a bit and hey presto, they are rehabilitated. David Millar seems to have pulled off the 'doper to doping guru' by exploiting the 'redemption' narrative. Unless there's a lot more revealed, I reckon DB will step back temporarily before, as others point out, re-emerging as some kind of go-to-cycling guru, and this will not be mentioned again.
Wiggins I don't think will be untainted by the TUE affair, partly because he hasn't been an Establishment / institutional pet.
If Sky fold and Brit Cycling are shown to be less than squeaky clean, cycling, the sport side might take a big hit and then so does Millar as he is promoting the various stuff in the UK market as that was the biggest growing market for cycling. It just might now collapse.