• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Poll: Is Dave Brailsford's position safe at team Sky?

The ship is sinking for Dave Brailsford, will he weather the storm?

  • Yes

    Votes: 16 25.4%
  • No

    Votes: 22 34.9%
  • Good riddance.

    Votes: 20 31.7%
  • Damn, I'll be sorry to see him go.

    Votes: 2 3.2%
  • Who's Dave Brailsford?

    Votes: 3 4.8%

  • Total voters
    63
Re:

King Boonen said:
I'm pretty sure he will, I've basically given up on bike racing as a sport :(

Why the sad face? Sky has brought back credibility to cycling. They don't need to be part of the MPCC or anything like that. They possess within their organization a higher and more superior ethic.
 
Oct 16, 2010
19,912
2
0
Re:

Electress said:
He'll get away with it...there' just not enough of an appetite with TPTB to see Skyfall.

Unless there is a mole who provides something more. I live in hope that this is so.
The mole has already provided everything needed to take the house down. From Matt's writings it is easy to discern that he knows what was in the package and that it wasn't flumicil but an ordinary ped.

In 2012 there were three witnesses who said Sutton was a doper, but the journal, Daily Mail, couldn't mention his name for legal reasons.
As he just denied doping infront of parliament, it would be a massive story now.

Just saying there is more than enough out there to take down sky.
It's with the journos and the lawyers now.
Rest assured, lots of legal chess and string pulling going on behind the scenes atm.
 
Since when does an off the record briefing then becomes part of an article - We worry about the morality of cyclists and sports-people doping, though I am more worried about the morality of journalists.
 
Oct 16, 2010
19,912
2
0
Re:

yaco said:
Since when does an off the record briefing then becomes part of an article - We worry about the morality of cyclists and sports-people doping, though I am more worried about the morality of journalists.
then maybe look for a forum where that particular issue is tackled.
 
Oct 16, 2010
19,912
2
0
Re:

King Boonen said:
Honestly, I think he'll get away with it if the UKAD report comes back "clean".
Yes, but my bet is he'll still resign.
He'll get cleared, then resigns.
A bit like Sutton (who effectively got cleared).
Win win.
 
Re: Re:

sniper said:
King Boonen said:
Honestly, I think he'll get away with it if the UKAD report comes back "clean".
Yes, but my bet is he'll still resign.
He'll get cleared, then resigns.
A bit like Sutton (who effectively got cleared).
Win win.

This. I reckon he'll weather it in the short term and then gradually step out of the limelight next season. Perhaps 'moving upstairs' to some kind of advisory role with less direct accountability.
 
Re: Re:

DFA123 said:
sniper said:
King Boonen said:
Honestly, I think he'll get away with it if the UKAD report comes back "clean".
Yes, but my bet is he'll still resign.
He'll get cleared, then resigns.
A bit like Sutton (who effectively got cleared).
Win win.

This. I reckon he'll weather it in the short term and then gradually step out of the limelight next season. Perhaps 'moving upstairs' to some kind of advisory role with less direct accountability.

Bingo! They won't officially sack him and instead the story will either be that he resigns or steps back to do other things.
 
Dec 21, 2016
44
0
0
Re: Re:

DFA123 said:
This. I reckon he'll weather it in the short term and then gradually step out of the limelight next season. Perhaps 'moving upstairs' to some kind of advisory role with less direct accountability.

I think this is what's going to happen and it doesn't really matter if he's truly guilty or not. Damaged goods are damaged goods and should be removed from the public eye. It's also what usually happens with people in public places, once their credibility is lost and their persona becomes tainted, they'll step down or out of the limelight, no matter if the actual cause of that loss or taint was legit. Having a good, no, decent reputation is everything in a public position and once you've lost that, you're gone, no matter the cause.

In this case I suspect the cause is legit, though. This story reeks and, with no supporting evidence, I don't buy it.
 
Oct 6, 2009
5,270
2
0
Given the way cycling appears to work, they'll probably move Brailsford from running Sky to some prime post at the UCI.
 
Re: Re:

sniper said:
yaco said:
Since when does an off the record briefing then becomes part of an article - We worry about the morality of cyclists and sports-people doping, though I am more worried about the morality of journalists.
then maybe look for a forum where that particular issue is tackled.

I am in the right forum - Your posts follow a theme of 'morality' and to make the cycling world a better place and by extension the world - Somehow you seem to have selective morality.

Do you really think Sky will close down ? After all their key sponsor is hardly recognised for their morality Very doubtful that Brailsford will move on - All it means is Sky will be more careful but they will go on winning races - Can see little if no change.
 
Re: Re:

sniper said:
King Boonen said:
Honestly, I think he'll get away with it if the UKAD report comes back "clean".
Yes, but my bet is he'll still resign.
He'll get cleared, then resigns.
A bit like Sutton (who effectively got cleared).
Win win.

Do you believe the PR spin that Sutton resigned ? - He was sacked,though begrudgingly by BA.
 
Re: Re:

Strange Loop said:
DFA123 said:
This. I reckon he'll weather it in the short term and then gradually step out of the limelight next season. Perhaps 'moving upstairs' to some kind of advisory role with less direct accountability.

I think this is what's going to happen and it doesn't really matter if he's truly guilty or not. Damaged goods are damaged goods and should be removed from the public eye. It's also what usually happens with people in public places, once their credibility is lost and their persona becomes tainted, they'll step down or out of the limelight, no matter if the actual cause of that loss or taint was legit. Having a good, no, decent reputation is everything in a public position and once you've lost that, you're gone, no matter the cause.

In this case I suspect the cause is legit, though. This story reeks and, with no supporting evidence, I don't buy it.

I would have agreed with you a few years ago, but not now. Not the world of cycling, but look at Keith Vaz and politician of all classes too numerous to mention. People have merely to fade from public life for a bit and hey presto, they are rehabilitated. David Millar seems to have pulled off the 'doper to doping guru' by exploiting the 'redemption' narrative. Unless there's a lot more revealed, I reckon DB will step back temporarily before, as others point out, re-emerging as some kind of go-to-cycling guru, and this will not be mentioned again.

Wiggins I don't think will be untainted by the TUE affair, partly because he hasn't been an Establishment / institutional pet.
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
People are starting to talk, as was obvious from jiffybag story leak to Matt Lawton

but others too

Ken Matheson@kenem
@Scienceofsport Long statement going back 18yrs re. DB's lies, bullying, harassment, wrongful dismissal of staff, financial misconduct etc..
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
Re: Re:

Electress said:
Strange Loop said:
DFA123 said:
This. I reckon he'll weather it in the short term and then gradually step out of the limelight next season. Perhaps 'moving upstairs' to some kind of advisory role with less direct accountability.

I think this is what's going to happen and it doesn't really matter if he's truly guilty or not. Damaged goods are damaged goods and should be removed from the public eye. It's also what usually happens with people in public places, once their credibility is lost and their persona becomes tainted, they'll step down or out of the limelight, no matter if the actual cause of that loss or taint was legit. Having a good, no, decent reputation is everything in a public position and once you've lost that, you're gone, no matter the cause.

In this case I suspect the cause is legit, though. This story reeks and, with no supporting evidence, I don't buy it.

I would have agreed with you a few years ago, but not now. Not the world of cycling, but look at Keith Vaz and politician of all classes too numerous to mention. People have merely to fade from public life for a bit and hey presto, they are rehabilitated. David Millar seems to have pulled off the 'doper to doping guru' by exploiting the 'redemption' narrative. Unless there's a lot more revealed, I reckon DB will step back temporarily before, as others point out, re-emerging as some kind of go-to-cycling guru, and this will not be mentioned again.

Wiggins I don't think will be untainted by the TUE affair, partly because he hasn't been an Establishment / institutional pet.

If Sky fold and Brit Cycling are shown to be less than squeaky clean, cycling, the sport side might take a big hit and then so does Millar as he is promoting the various stuff in the UK market as that was the biggest growing market for cycling. It just might now collapse.
 
Oct 16, 2010
19,912
2
0
Re:

Benotti69 said:
People are starting to talk, as was obvious from jiffybag story leak to Matt Lawton

but others too

Ken Matheson@kenem
@Scienceofsport Long statement going back 18yrs re. DB's lies, bullying, harassment, wrongful dismissal of staff, financial misconduct etc..
I thought he was a mastermind. :confused:

Matheson jumping ship and speaking out means things are pretty bad for DB and BC.
 
Re: Re:

Benotti69 said:
Electress said:
Strange Loop said:
DFA123 said:
This. I reckon he'll weather it in the short term and then gradually step out of the limelight next season. Perhaps 'moving upstairs' to some kind of advisory role with less direct accountability.

I think this is what's going to happen and it doesn't really matter if he's truly guilty or not. Damaged goods are damaged goods and should be removed from the public eye. It's also what usually happens with people in public places, once their credibility is lost and their persona becomes tainted, they'll step down or out of the limelight, no matter if the actual cause of that loss or taint was legit. Having a good, no, decent reputation is everything in a public position and once you've lost that, you're gone, no matter the cause.

In this case I suspect the cause is legit, though. This story reeks and, with no supporting evidence, I don't buy it.

I would have agreed with you a few years ago, but not now. Not the world of cycling, but look at Keith Vaz and politician of all classes too numerous to mention. People have merely to fade from public life for a bit and hey presto, they are rehabilitated. David Millar seems to have pulled off the 'doper to doping guru' by exploiting the 'redemption' narrative. Unless there's a lot more revealed, I reckon DB will step back temporarily before, as others point out, re-emerging as some kind of go-to-cycling guru, and this will not be mentioned again.

Wiggins I don't think will be untainted by the TUE affair, partly because he hasn't been an Establishment / institutional pet.

If Sky fold and Brit Cycling are shown to be less than squeaky clean, cycling, the sport side might take a big hit and then so does Millar as he is promoting the various stuff in the UK market as that was the biggest growing market for cycling. It just might now collapse.

Nah, Millar 'reformed doper' will merely be called upon to offer his unique insight into the revelations and what it means for the sport blah blah blah. He will intone his wisdom, express his disappointment, and probably be appointed to some task force to deal with it, assuming it gets that far.