The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
"He has had numerous allegations thrown at him through the years but hopefully he hasn't done anything wrong. Hopefully people can let it go."
In recent times no athlete has been more perspecuted and tested than Armstrong, and that in a sport where they do test for and control EVERYTHING. And if he hasn't been suspended after over 500 tests and being under surveillance 24 hours a day, well, allow me to have my doubts about whether or not these accusations are unfounded and are based on strong evidence. This is cycling! And lastly, I'll also say that if all of this is confirmed by the evidence I will condemn him too, but right now there's absolutely nothing! I repeat: if this is confirmed, I would be extremely disappointed too. I raced with him. I admired him, and will always admire him until proven otherwise.
DirtyWorks said:Gerard Vroomen's first swipe at it calls Horner's arguments B.S. Which they are...
http://gerard.cc/2012/06/15/horner-on-lance/
You can’t have it both ways, using the agencies’ testing to demonstrate Lance is clean but then say their testing sucks.
joe_papp said:The USADA - Armstrong thread is getting dense and difficult to navigate but regardless, we need a separate place to keep track of (even limited) reaction from the pro peloton to #USPSConspiracy.
Please post the following:
1) RIDER NAME
2) QUOTE
3) Link/URL
joe_papp said:I'll start...
CHRIS HORNER
“I don’t believe Armstrong has cheated in any way to win those victories and he’s gone through an insane amount of testing. Do we have pictures of it? Video or testing? Because without that you really don’t have anything.”
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/chris-horner-i-dont-believe-armstrong-cheated
BotanyBay said:Off topic. Admins please remove. I really would like to see this thread become a useful resource for us. Let's see who's who!
hrotha said:Great thread, and absolutely necessary.
Parrulo said:this thread is a good idea, let's stick to reactions tho.
King Of The Wolds said:I think Thomas is 'on message'.
Sky pump millions into cycling and don't want it's image dragging through the dirt again.
It would be harsh to vilify a young lad, who was knee high to a grasshopper when Lance started winning things in cycling, who just wants to please the guys who pay him handsomely.
thehog said:No he's not bang on.
He's fortunate to live in times where's there's not the pressure to dope like in years gone by. Better he and Sky understand what others have been through so we never see a repeat of 1999-2005/09-10.
He also knows better. He's not so oblivious to know that doping wa rife at USPS. Much better to say nothing at all then play the game of surpise.
King Of The Wolds said:I didn't say he was bang on. I said he's 'on message'. Badly advised.
He has a relationship with the BBC (he writes an occasional blog for the website), so if they ask him for some comments, and his bosses at British Cycling/Sky ask him to say what he did, what's a young lad supposed to do?
3) Link To QuoteThe USADA - Armstrong thread is getting dense and difficult to navigate but regardless, we need a separate place to keep track of (even limited) reaction from the pro peloton to #USPSConspiracy.
joe_papp said:Thanks, guys. Inspiration for this came from whomever it was who first posted about Thomas's reactions in the main USADA vs. Lance thread.