The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
hrotha said:Unlike many other dopers, he served his ban. Being a jerk is not grounds for a suspension right now.
JRTinMA said:Shouldn't he be suspended based on the fact that he is involved in an ongoing investigation? The 50 pills found in a the raid.
Leipheimer tested positive for ephedrine in 96.El Pistolero said:They don't have anything on Leipheimer, so why include him in your list?
If they can't even ban Armstrong with the evidence against him then they sure as hell can't touch Leipheimer.
goggalor said:Leipheimer tested positive for ephedrine in 96.![]()
goggalor said:Leipheimer tested positive for ephedrine in 96.![]()
Because whatever one thinks of them, they've done their time and the rules say they can race once the ban is served.goggalor said:Why is Vino/Basso/Leipheimer/Millar/Hugh Nameit still racing?
El Pistolero said:And you want a lifetime ban for that lol? He wasn't even pro then and was punished for it. It's pretty well known that the U23 category is even dirtier then the professional one. Why do you think guys like Cancellara skipped that category completely?
Just saying, Leipheimer doesn't belong in that list.
hrotha said:Being a jerk is not grounds for a suspension right now.
JMBeaushrimp said:I love the Amerocentric posters! Nothing's news unless it's American news. Love it!
Hey, by every indication from all who know him, Tyler Hamilton is one of the friendliest guys in cycling ever.Christian said:Many people in Contador's entourage (the latest was the chef) keep saying how they have no reason not to believe him, because he "is a genuinely nice person".
Dekker_Tifosi said:this is the problem
people read about an investigation, because it is 'big news'
however, they don't read the part where it was announced it were only sleep pills, because that news appearently isn't spectaculair enough.
I blame journalist for this type of error. They are only interested in the initial story, when it turns out to be nothing they simply ignore that and don't make a report about it
Alpe d'Huez said:+2, and I'm American!
Seriously though. I'd put about 100 people on that list before Levi. Not that I think he's squeaky clean mind you, it's just that there are so many more scoundrels to choose from.
Did I say anything about a lifetime ban? It's just a quick little list of former dopers who were rehabilitated and are now back and winning. Leipheimer belongs there.El Pistolero said:And you want a lifetime ban for that lol? He wasn't even pro then and was punished for it. It's pretty well known that the U23 category is even dirtier then the professional one. Why do you think guys like Cancellara skipped that category completely?
Just saying, Leipheimer doesn't belong in that list.
Uh, yeah, Ricco has also served his ban. Why shouldn't he be allowed to race (and win), like the rest of the riders I mentioned?ultimobici said:Because whatever one thinks of them, they've done their time and the rules say they can race once the ban is served.
Vino - Served the 2 years
Basso - Served 2 years
Leipheimer - OK I'll allow you that one!
Millar - Served 2 years
Not hard is it? Or so you think that once someone has broken the law they should be an outcast forever? Are you sure you're as pure as driven snow?
How many of those are still racing? 3? 4? I file those under Hugh Nameit.Derukeman said:"Leipheimer belongs there"...lmao You left out that the test also showed Claritin-D in his test at that time. Putting Levi on your list and leaving off guys like Rasmussen, Igor Gonzalez, Hondo, Mayo, Kashechkin, Dekker, Pettachi, Boonen for Coke, and many others were much more serious than Levi..Come on
Derukeman said:"Leipheimer belongs there"...lmao You left out that the test also showed Claritin-D in his test at that time.