The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Robert5091 said:http://www.smh.com.au/sport/olympic...ed-by-police-at-gunpoint-20160725-gqcwy9.html
A New Zealand sportsman was forced into a car by armed police and made to withdraw the equivalent of $800 in Rio de Janeiro over the weekend, just 13 days before the Olympics are set to start in the city.
The police, who warned him not to report the incident and made efforts to avoid being seen, detained Jason Lee after pulling him off a highway into the city on Sunday.
Nah, the IOC have always loved at least partly classic locations: Rio is the furthest out (from heartlands) they've ever gone I believe and Rome and Paris are also on the list. It's also the centenary of Paris' one. I think (hope) we can say ciaone to dubai for a while.Red Rick said:Still somewhat suprised Qatar or some emirate isn't hosting the Olympics in 2020. Or this year for that matter. But luckily the Dubai is on the list for 2024, and I have no doubt they'll be the hightest bidder
And anyone who knows anything about economics, knows how risky such a thing is. There's enormous speculation involved in an area that's extremely expensive and uncertain.Olympic resistance has become mainstream. What we’re seeing is that the more information citizens have about how the IOC works, the less likely they are to want to engage in that kind of business contract.
Alpe d'Huez said:Great article, Movingtarget. I have the exact same sentiment.
And anyone who knows anything about economics, knows how risky such a thing is. There's enormous speculation involved in an area that's extremely expensive and uncertain.Olympic resistance has become mainstream. What we’re seeing is that the more information citizens have about how the IOC works, the less likely they are to want to engage in that kind of business contract.
Political and civic leaders have to look at such "investments" compare to any numerous other options, be that spending money on infrastructure and education, targeted zone tax breaks for emerging businesses or housing development, or just cutting taxes period, or floating bonds to build or expand current sports facilities that have potential long term ancillary revenue streams, such as baseball stadiums or multi-use arenas, and what future events can be potentially hosted there or in the region. When you think like a mayor of a city for example, nearly every one of those options seems like it's a better long-term use of the city's resources than hosting an Olympic games.
![]()
jmdirt said:Good article movingtarget! I read something after the Salt Lake winter Olympics: SL's payoff plan was 15-20 years, but its looking like it will be 25-30 actually (some of the numbers are hard to compile-ie: did these tourist come to SL/UT because they saw the Oly's?). The citizen support for the Oly's was between 40-60% before, up to 80% during, but 25-30% after. 365 days after the Oly's, 90% of citizens said that, in hind sight, it was a bad investment.
I enjoy watching the Olympics, and its the only time I watch most of those sports. I would hate to see them stop because no one is willing to take on the debt, but things have to change or that could happen. Host cities should already have the facilities to host the games instead of building them just for the games (the pictures of unused facilities rotting is shameful in many ways). Most major cities can do this. The athlete's village might be the one exception, so maybe the village could be designed to be used as affordable housing after the games (?).
That's OK too as long as the tax payers get a return on their investment (I realize that 'tax payer' means different things, in different parts of the world). My thought was that many/most USA cities need more affordable housing, that will likely get built anyway so if, for example, LA builds the athlete's village with that in mind it could save the taxpayers a lot of money while also having a very useful end product.movingtarget said:jmdirt said:Good article movingtarget! I read something after the Salt Lake winter Olympics: SL's payoff plan was 15-20 years, but its looking like it will be 25-30 actually (some of the numbers are hard to compile-ie: did these tourist come to SL/UT because they saw the Oly's?). The citizen support for the Oly's was between 40-60% before, up to 80% during, but 25-30% after. 365 days after the Oly's, 90% of citizens said that, in hind sight, it was a bad investment.
I enjoy watching the Olympics, and its the only time I watch most of those sports. I would hate to see them stop because no one is willing to take on the debt, but things have to change or that could happen. Host cities should already have the facilities to host the games instead of building them just for the games (the pictures of unused facilities rotting is shameful in many ways). Most major cities can do this. The athlete's village might be the one exception, so maybe the village could be designed to be used as affordable housing after the games (?).
I think in Sydney they converted the athletes village to not so affordable housing ! Sydney is still one of the most expensive places in the world for real estate. From what I remember they came up with a new suburb name and away they went. I wonder what happened to the sci fi looking stadium they used in South Africa for the World Cup final. I remember hearing that that was going to become a white elephant as well after the World Cup finished. Maybe other sports now use it, I'm not sure.
Robert5091 said:Aussies predict end of the Olympic games
http://www.smh.com.au/sport/the-fit...end-of-the-olympic-games-20160728-gqgaee.html
Hands up, now, who has confidence in the integrity of both the IOC and the Russian athletes?
OK, let me count, that's just about none of you. And now hands up who has confidence in an IOC president, who, just last year, swore the IOC would have "zero tolerance" for drug cheats? As I thought, a human sea of folded arms. For after all the evidence presented of all the systemic, state-sanctioned, doping pursued by Russia, who can have any confidence that any Russian gold medallist is clean?
The repercussions will go on for years, as the stories will inevitably emerge of outrageous cheating, just as they did with East Germany. As to whether Rio itself can cope with the influx of athlete and visitors, we will see, but certainly no Olympics has ever had a more shambolic lead-up and the reports from AOC Chef de Mission Kitty Chiller this week on the disgraceful state of the Olympic Village were sobering to say the least
FIFA is suddenly looking a lot better.movingtarget said:Robert5091 said:Aussies predict end of the Olympic games
http://www.smh.com.au/sport/the-fit...end-of-the-olympic-games-20160728-gqgaee.html
Hands up, now, who has confidence in the integrity of both the IOC and the Russian athletes?
OK, let me count, that's just about none of you. And now hands up who has confidence in an IOC president, who, just last year, swore the IOC would have "zero tolerance" for drug cheats? As I thought, a human sea of folded arms. For after all the evidence presented of all the systemic, state-sanctioned, doping pursued by Russia, who can have any confidence that any Russian gold medallist is clean?
The repercussions will go on for years, as the stories will inevitably emerge of outrageous cheating, just as they did with East Germany. As to whether Rio itself can cope with the influx of athlete and visitors, we will see, but certainly no Olympics has ever had a more shambolic lead-up and the reports from AOC Chef de Mission Kitty Chiller this week on the disgraceful state of the Olympic Village were sobering to say the least
It's already looking like a farce and it has not officially started yet. Not to mention the robberies and assaults that have already happened to news crews and competitors. It seems security is struggling as well and that's before the majority of the spectators have turned up !
gooner said:Obviously cycling but other than that, athletics, a bit of football(men and women), might take in the triathlon this time, swimming, and boxing to see how some of the Irish lads do. I fancy a couple of medals there.