http://velonews.competitor.com/2011...s-stoppers-from-campagnolo-and-shimano_200751
Reminds me of the old deore xts on an old MB1 I had.
Reminds me of the old deore xts on an old MB1 I had.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
richwagmn said:http://velonews.competitor.com/2011...s-stoppers-from-campagnolo-and-shimano_200751
Reminds me of the old deore xts on an old MB1 I had.
richwagmn said:So when did old style cantilevers come back?
Bustedknuckle said:Cross has seen a huge increase in the US lately, so you see things like these brakes. shimano never stopped making canti brakes but these specific to cross...Plus cantis have always been compatible with road levers/STI/ERGO.
DirtyWorks said:Mafac's are an inferior design that was long ago superceded and yet probably the only thing moving off the shelf. Why anyone wants to spend time and money on this style brake is incontrovertible proof today's 'Cross consumers are dumber and twice as fashion sensitive as roadies.
RDV4ROUBAIX said:They never went away. Follow CX much?
richwagmn said:No sir. Busted Knuckles explanation makes sense.
RDV4ROUBAIX said:What in the world do canti brakes have anything to do with fashion? Superseded by what?
So I should just dump my (silent & perfectly powerful) Campag CX's in the bin?DirtyWorks said:The simple fact that Mafacs were the first, awful, choice for cantilever brakes until the inline cantilever. There's a reason the cantilevers went inline before going to v-brakes. It works much better. Shimano wasn't first, but everyone is pretty familiar with theirs.
Do you ever wonder why you see the outboard cantilever style shaped like a triangle instead of the 'lazy L' Mafac style? The pad twists badly in the Mafac design so they have to be set up with crazy toe-in to limit the howling.
But no. Instead of evaluating brakes for their performance, it's gotta resemble some bit of history. The time to move on was the 1990's.
In 2012 you've got two options.
Option 1: Avid Shorty 6's or old Shimano compacts. The cheap and dirty tektro 862a is functional, but not great. Everything is inline so nothing gets caught with slightly better braking performance. Work with road shifter levers.
Option 2: v-brakes. Tektro has a very nice compact v-brake. Much better braking performance. Probably too much brake for most races. Need the little travel gadget for road levers unless you go bar end shifter. Tektro has a very nice linear pull brake lever.
DirtyWorks said:The simple fact that Mafacs were the first, awful, choice for cantilever brakes until the inline cantilever. There's a reason the cantilevers went inline before going to v-brakes. It works much better. Shimano wasn't first, but everyone is pretty familiar with theirs.
Do you ever wonder why you see the outboard cantilever style shaped like a triangle instead of the 'lazy L' Mafac style? The pad twists badly in the Mafac design so they have to be set up with crazy toe-in to limit the howling.
But no. Instead of evaluating brakes for their performance, it's gotta resemble some bit of history. The time to move on was the 1990's.
In 2012 you've got two options.
Option 1: Avid Shorty 6's or old Shimano compacts. The cheap and dirty tektro 862a is functional, but not great. Everything is inline so nothing gets caught with slightly better braking performance. Work with road shifter levers.
Option 2: v-brakes. Tektro has a very nice compact v-brake. Much better braking performance. Probably too much brake for most races. Need the little travel gadget for road levers unless you go bar end shifter. Tektro has a very nice linear pull brake lever.