He looks bulkier for sure. But he wasn't by any means less stellar than other years. It's clear he could have won with 30" moreAnd because of that he did 40 watts more than the years before.
He looks bulkier for sure. But he wasn't by any means less stellar than other years. It's clear he could have won with 30" moreAnd because of that he did 40 watts more than the years before.
Yea he was worse , he just beat his record on santa Marie by 50 secondsAnd because of that he did 40 watts more than the years before.
And because of that he did 40 watts more than the years before.
Don't know if this proverb is in English too, but it goes like this: eat ***, people! Millions of flies surely can't be wrong!I saw thousands real fans that disagreed with that today.
Yea, but look at the difference with anything else. Who can go from that distance out, repeatedly, and win GTs, and put him on the ropes on terrain in which he excells? A bigger alien indeed. I can't wait for MSR and the cobbles. 6-2 is a nice compensation, but what we see is extraterrestrial. Also because it's so smooth. "A race where [Mathieu] Van der Poel and [Tadej] Pogačar competed on equal footing – every organizer's dream." Herein lies the difference, not small.He's a bigger alien overall of course, but over the last 3-4 years MVP has leveled up to a point he can produce the best CX level ever while nosebreathing (yeah it's CX, but I still value being a clear GOAT of another discipline) and then go on to beat Pogacar 6-2 in those monuments. He absolutely is an alien of similar caliber to Pogacar in this period, something no one else is in anything since 2024, if we're excluding TT.
Don't know if this proverb is in English too, but it goes like this: eat ***, people! Millions of flies surely can't be wrong!
Pog was on cruise control.Didn’t see anything today of the race today, but happy to see Seixas finish second. Pogacar only took 1min, was he holding back or not that impressive as usual?
Race shorter than last year, gaps are smaller. I swear people are statistically illiterate.I don't know if you can believe these kind of estimates for 80 km distance. They can have big errors and they don't even know Pogacar's current mass and conditions.
Race shorter than last year, gaps are smaller. I swear people are statistically illiterate.
I know the race is shorter, but it‘s 12 kilometers, not 50 or something.Race shorter than last year, gaps are smaller. I swear people are statistically illiterate.
Conditions were clearly way better. Women had the fastest Strade as well. Better gravel conditions probably reduce fatigue by a lot.I know the race is shorter, but it‘s 12 kilometers, not 50 or something.
No, my idea is that Pogačar of 2025 and 2024 would win by more.Conditions were clearly way better. Women had the fastest Strade as well. Better gravel conditions probably reduce fatigue by a lot.
Like if we want to run with the idea that Pogacar of 2025 or 2024 would not be winning this that just seems weird to me
Conditions were clearly way better. Women had the fastest Strade as well. Better gravel conditions probably reduce fatigue by a lot.
Like if we want to run with the idea that Pogacar of 2025 or 2024 would not be winning this that just seems weird to me
The conditions were perfect and the race was easier than last year before Sante Marie. I also would not believe these estimated watts, they have often been wrong in the past.
But I do believe that the general level was very high this year, much higher than 2024 and higher than last year. And I do believe that Pogacar pushed more watts even though the gaps were smaller, the field was a bit better and individual riders have also improved.
This race also confirmed my estimate for Seixas' climb last week (higher Index than Del Toro in UAE).
40 watts is a a lot, but 20-30 watts more could be possible. Last year he did not go all out (+harder course + crash) and 2 years ago his form was IMO not as good as people think and he was probably 2kg lighter than now.This year's race was 30-35 minutes shorter than those from the last two editions (they were more attritional). So the watts could've been higher (but by a much smaller % than suggested).
40 watts is a a lot, but 20-30 watts more could be possible. Last year he did not go all out (+harder course + crash) and 2 years ago his form was IMO not as good as people think and he was probably 2kg lighter than now.
Whats appropriate index adjustment for yeeting yourself in a ditch?This year's race was 30-35 minutes shorter than those from the last two editions (they were more attritional). So the watts could've been higher (but by a much smaller % than suggested).
Watts off the bike don't count. So flying through the air, stand up and running back on the road is worth a big fat zero watts for me.Whats appropriate index adjustment for yeeting yourself in a ditch?
I was not btw. Unfortunately switching off with 80km to go today was not of much help.But the real question is if you were watching Finestre live?
Probably a stupid question, all the data from the Giro indicated Gigs was attending a coma.
We appreciate the attempted sacrifice once againI was not btw. Unfortunately switching off with 80km to go today was not of much help.
