Szczepaniaks re-instated

[BrandonT]

http://www.cxmagazine.com/uci-to-re...clocross-championships-results-rainbow-jersey

Is this right or wrong?

 

[Susan Westemeyer]

You did see the date on that story, didn't you?

Susan

 

[180mmCrank]

I think this is a slightly more legitimate version of the story but still as unbelieveable...

http://www.cxmagazine.com/pawel-szczepaniak-admits-to-epo

 

[Hugh Januss]

You did see the date on that story, didn't you?

Susan

In other news Funk & Wagnalls has announced that it is removing the word gullible from its dictionaries.

 

[BrandonT]

I didn't really believe it so that is why I asked. I hadn't noticed any story on this website so I figured it was a hoax.

 

[timbat]

I read the older brother was banned for 8 years, the younger brother 4 ....

http://www.cxmagazine.com/szczepaniaks-receive-doping-suspensions-u23-podium-resolved

Who gets 8 years ever ? What an injustice in sentencing. Compare to Basso and Vino with their 2 year bans ...

 

[Echoes]

Jouffroy said on Cyclismag that the Szczepaniak were already warned when they were juniors. Does somebody know more about that? Has that had any influence on the sentence?

 

[Susan Westemeyer]

Look here: http://forum.cyclingnews.com/showthread.php?t=7596

Susan

 

[Echoes]

Many thanks Susan.

If Pawel is a recidivist, I think he should get a life ban.

However, Kacper should get 2 years like the others. If he forot to take the TUE, it's not doping but a professional mistake. For him the sentence is not fair, definitely.