The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Geraint Too Fast said:
greenedge said:I really don't want to namedrop, but I'd like a discussion about the merits of picking Boonen on the squad. If he can gain his 2012 form, he could just double his score, while the WC RR course suits him very much. What does everyone else think?
You have to risk to win a game And if you want to win a game you can't show your cardsItalianGigolo said:Oh, almost forgot! Is Sagan a good pick this year or too risky in your opinion?
ItalianGigolo said:Beside Fatty and Cav, I believe Ullisi might prove to be a very good 600-700 pick.However I'm not sure what's going on with his dopping problems. Is his case still investigated or he is ok for the next season?
ItalianGigolo said:Beside Fatty and Cav, I believe Ullisi might prove to be a very good 600-700 pick.However I'm not sure what's going on with his dopping problems. Is his case still investigated or he is ok for the next season?
Some other intersting names fopr me are Cunego and Voeckler(now that they will compete for PCT teams) and also some guys from Cult Energy team now that they are PCT too. I also think a particular guy from IAM will have a really good year at WT level and score like he used to do some years ago if he stays away from crashes.
Last but not least , am I the only one who thinks Dan Martin can score 2000+ points this year?
Oh, almost forgot! Is Sagan a good pick this year or too risky in your opinion?
ItalianGigolo said:Last but not least , am I the only one who thinks Dan Martin can score 2000+ points this year?
greenedge said:I really don't want to namedrop, but I'd like a discussion about the merits of picking Boonen on the squad. If he can gain his 2012 form, he could just double his score, while the WC RR course suits him very much. What does everyone else think?
GP Blanco said:Simon Yates might be interesting. Showed some quality this year but he had also some injuries.
postmanhat said:My first year doing the CQ game, and with very limited knowledge my picks for are based on
a) fanboyism
b) Riders who were injured for a lot of last year
Simon Yates and Ian Stannard fall into both categories
Was wondering whether Tim Wellens is worth the risk for the first? And Taylor Phinney for the second? Any news on his plans for 2015?
Netserk said:H2H
Who do you think will do best of Sepulveda and Kudus? Both cost the exact same (241). Neither, one or both of them worth having on your team?
Personally I rate Sepulveda higher for next year, but after that it's Kudus all the way
Netserk said:H2H
Who do you think will do best of Sepulveda and Kudus? Both cost the exact same (241). Neither, one or both of them worth having on your team?
Personally I rate Sepulveda higher for next year, but after that it's Kudus all the way
Netserk said:H2H
Who do you think will do best of Sepulveda and Kudus? Both cost the exact same (241). Neither, one or both of them worth having on your team?
Personally I rate Sepulveda higher for next year, but after that it's Kudus all the way
vladimir said:Good luck with your team!
Wellens; one of the best picks this year but needs to put in a spectacular season to be considered for 2015. Not on my longlist for the 2015 game even though I'm a big fan. Probably a better choice for the 2016 game
Phinney; the last I heared is that he will miss most of the spring season. Extremly cheap considering his potential, but of course risky as his injury might set him back for most of the season. However the Worlds is in USA next year and the route should be tailor made for young Phinney so he might be an excellent choice. Currently not in my team, but that might change during the coming week...