Teams & Riders The 2021 sprinters thread

Aug 18, 2010
11,435
3,594
28,180
There’s a sprinters thread most years, a place for the usual arguments and more importantly comparisons that would otherwise get scattered across a hundred race threads and a bunch of rider’s threads.

I’ll also try to keep a running count of sprint wins here. The count is of wins in finishes that could reasonably be considered bunch sprints, including reduced bunch sprints. Other wins by sprinters don’t count. In general if there’s some doubt about whether it should count, it will get the benefit of the doubt.

(As of 11 March)

Rider Wins (WT)
Bennett 4(4)
Ballerini 3(1)
Merlier 2(0)
Ewan 1(1)
Bol 1(1)
Van Aert 1(1)
Pedersen 1(0)
Laporte 1(0)
Paret-Peintre 1(0)
Dupont 1(0)
Bauhaus 1(0)
Nizzolo 1(0)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: happytramp
Aug 18, 2010
11,435
3,594
28,180
So in the early season it’s all Deceuninck Quickstep and the other big sprinting teams have yet to make a mark. Bennett has started the season as top dog, Ballerini is in the form of his life.

Ewan and Lotto wont be feeling under too much pressure, having picked up a win. Bol will be happy with the biggest win of his career at PN. Demare and Ackermann can’t be too pleased with their return at this point but there’s a long way to go. It’s hard to know how to assess Gaviria and Viviani, both on the comeback trail after health problems.
 
Last edited:
Aug 18, 2010
11,435
3,594
28,180
Bennett's en Bol's wins in PN are included, but van Aert's win in TA not?

And are these only in stage races? Because otherwise Merlier should be on 2 already.

no they’ll all be included, I just missed a few in my first pass over the results sheet. Please remind me when I inevitably forget to add more.
 
Sep 7, 2011
1,568
347
11,180
What is up with FDJ this year? In 2020 they had a top class train, maybe even better than quickstep.... This year.....tumbleweeds.
 
Sep 7, 2011
1,568
347
11,180
BORA must be kicking themselves. Bent over backwards to accommodate Sagan and Ackerman at Bennett's expense but neither seem capable of delivering right now... Bennett meanwhile is devouring all before him.
 
Sep 20, 2017
12,404
23,451
28,180
Ackermann hasn't shown great power this year, but there's also the thing that the Bora train got disrupted by that car accident.
Even last year, Bennett was clearly doing better than Ackermann. Sagan has been superseded by the new generation and isn't worth his fat contract at all anymore, Covid or no Covid.
 
Mar 19, 2009
9,892
1,790
20,680
BORA must be kicking themselves. Bent over backwards to accommodate Sagan and Ackerman at Bennett's expense but neither seem capable of delivering right now... Bennett meanwhile is devouring all before him.
I agree to a certain extent but as we've seen over the last decade, the QS effect is a real thing. It's a huge advantage and it's more than just the leadout train.
 
Aug 18, 2010
11,435
3,594
28,180
I agree to a certain extent but as we've seen over the last decade, the QS effect is a real thing. It's a huge advantage and it's more than just the leadout train.

it definitely is a big advantage. But Bennett had an amazing last year with Bora. he had 11 WT wins out of 13 with basically no leadout. He was much, much better the year before he moved to QS than say Viviani was the year before he went there. Bora knew he was extremely good and they took the risk of having him leave and then rip them a new one at Quickstep anyway.

it was understandable that Bora prioritised Ackermann and Sagan. Sagan is Sagan and was the team’s meal ticket. Ackermann also had an excellent 2019 and is German and younger and had a longer contract. And let’s be clear, they really wanted to keep Bennett. They prioritised the other two in GTs but otherwise gave Bennett a good calendar, they didn’t put him on what touring bands used to call the toilet circuit. His departure got quietly bitter because they somehow thought they could keep all three when there just aren’t enough big races to split three ways. But when you get right down to it they didn’t really make their decisions about who to prioritise on simple sporting grounds and it has bit them on the bumhole since.

Im still an Ackermann believer. I think he at some point is going to get his 2019 form back and then improve from there. He’s not making me look very wise right now though. his timing had just been so bad recently.
 
Last edited:
Aug 18, 2010
11,435
3,594
28,180
What is up with FDJ this year? In 2020 they had a top class train, maybe even better than quickstep.... This year.....tumbleweeds.

It will be interesting to see how Demare does this year on the Big Boy calendar, racing the strongest opposition much more frequently. It’s far too early to tell of course.
 
May 10, 2013
5,455
3,245
23,180
I wonder what all other sprinters must feel to see someone like Paret-Peintre on this list and not them.
 
Aug 18, 2010
11,435
3,594
28,180
I wonder what all other sprinters must feel to see someone like Paret-Peintre on this list and not them.

I would guess that quite a lot of them would think “who?”. And the others would feel that they need to get some little French races on their calendar.
 
Jun 10, 2017
5,246
3,467
23,180
What is up with FDJ this year? In 2020 they had a top class train, maybe even better than quickstep.... This year.....tumbleweeds.
I thought they did a good job on P-N stage 1, controlled the bunch for much of the final 5km, and delivered Demare to the line with a good chance to win. Bennett, with no train, just picked the right wheel to follow and came through with that bit more speed.
 
Mar 19, 2009
9,892
1,790
20,680
A shame we're missing Jakobsen and Groenewegen. Before The Crash™ if you had asked me who I thought would turn out to be the fastest sprinters over the next 5 years, I might have said those two.

Obviously true greatness is always fun to watch, but I like this sprint era we're in, where there's no Cavendish/Kittel/Petacchi type that is clearly faster than everyone else and you know they're going to win 80% of the time. Even Greipel in his day, if Cav wasn't around he was basically automatic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Aug 18, 2010
11,435
3,594
28,180
Suppose that depends on how big a group needs to be before it's considered a (reduced) bunch sprint.

yeah that’s an interesting one because I think it’s almost exactly where I would draw the (completely arbitrary) line between “reduced bunch” on the one hand and “elite selection” or “small group“ on the other. It’s totally reasonable to draw the line at a slightly bigger or smaller point though, there just has to be one somewhere.
 
Sep 26, 2020
25,331
27,826
23,180
If we look at awarded time gaps, Paret-Peintre's win in Marseille was actually coming from a smaller group than Alaphilippe's victory yesterday.