- Apr 20, 2012
- 6,320
- 0
- 0
This has been on my mind for a long time. Also from a personal point of view, not just the doping. When you sport; cycle, soccer, running etc etc your body 'makes' endorfine, adrenaline etc etc. Endorfine will make you feel good, you get a natural high. Runners often call it the runners high. Adrenaline can get you in 'the rush'.
I was a reasonable high athlete - untill injuries in knee, ankle and back fukked that up - and I experienced the reverse side of the endorfine high; a depression. Other things contributed to that as well but since I had to give up my sport - untill the moment I accepted the injuries were too bad and I would be able to enjoy my sports at a lower level, formerly unacceptable - I did not get my dose of endorfine any more. Same goes of course for adrenaline and all the other hormonal things affected by sports.
When I read Hamilton's book the Secret Race and got to the passage on his first EPO use it got me thinking:
There have been numerous cases in the past of addicted cyclists, Johan van de Velde comes to mind as a Dutchman - amphetamines - who got into serious troubles with the law subsequently, others fell into a very serious depression with death as a result, we all know who those were.
What does doping do with athletes on the psychological side of it? And, maybe even better, what happens to in this case cyclists who stop, or are forced to stop because of a doping positive? Do they believe the myth they have build up through doping? Do they believe they have become superhumans? How deep is the flipside when they realize - if they ever do - it was not real?
On the other hand, have the enablers - doctors, directeurs sportifs, fans etc etc - ever stood still at those questions? Are they also responsible for the deaths, the depressions of riders - antidepressiva have been very popular in the pelotoon - or not? Is doping addictive and shouldnt doping be getting the same responce as drugs in legal terms?
I was a reasonable high athlete - untill injuries in knee, ankle and back fukked that up - and I experienced the reverse side of the endorfine high; a depression. Other things contributed to that as well but since I had to give up my sport
When I read Hamilton's book the Secret Race and got to the passage on his first EPO use it got me thinking:
Translated from the Dutch version, page 64.The Secret Race said:How does it feel to use EPO? It feels amazing, especially because you feel nothing. You are not exhausted. You feel good, normal, strong. You have more colour in you face, less cranky, nicer to the people surrounding you. Those little drips of fluid work like radiosignals, they give your kidneys the message to prodruce more RBC's, soon there will be millions more in your veins who will transport oxigen to your muscles. Your body is still the same, except for having better fuel. You can ride harder and longer.
There have been numerous cases in the past of addicted cyclists, Johan van de Velde comes to mind as a Dutchman - amphetamines - who got into serious troubles with the law subsequently, others fell into a very serious depression with death as a result, we all know who those were.
What does doping do with athletes on the psychological side of it? And, maybe even better, what happens to in this case cyclists who stop, or are forced to stop because of a doping positive? Do they believe the myth they have build up through doping? Do they believe they have become superhumans? How deep is the flipside when they realize - if they ever do - it was not real?
On the other hand, have the enablers - doctors, directeurs sportifs, fans etc etc - ever stood still at those questions? Are they also responsible for the deaths, the depressions of riders - antidepressiva have been very popular in the pelotoon - or not? Is doping addictive and shouldnt doping be getting the same responce as drugs in legal terms?