I think it's Hodeg.Sorry to be mildly face blind but is the rider looking like "wtf are you doing?" your beloved Alvaro, or is it the Vakoc that went to Alpecin?
Vakoc would have the Czech stripes on his sleeves.
I think it's Hodeg.Sorry to be mildly face blind but is the rider looking like "wtf are you doing?" your beloved Alvaro, or is it the Vakoc that went to Alpecin?
I think that 95% of the people who discuss this "Remco vs Wout battle" haven't actually seen the Extra Time show. While De Wolf and Van der Poel were questioning the tactics and De Wolf in a very blunt way, Remco was very mature and honest in his answers and was not questioning the coach. Yes, he had some doubts about his own role and he was also honest in telling the coach during the race (while being in a great spot) that his legs where very good but the coach confirmed that they would still go all-in for Wout with Jasper apparantly as a fall back and not him. It was only then that things where absolutely clear for him. To me this means that, before that moment, Vanthourenout never said in very clear words that Remco was only there to help. Remco was fine with it. He actually said that it was better this way. Of course, in the end he was disappointed that there was no medal for Belgium while there were opportunities (for him and Jasper). He had hoped that Wout was honest about his "bad legs" from the moment he felt it.
To me, it looks like the media wants to polarise things. It helps in selling articles. They also know that Remco is very open in his communication, something I like about him but that can be misused. I can also imagine that Wout, being emotionally involved, was not at all pleased with the show and in particular with the words of De Wolf. If he listened carefully, he would understand that Remco was not making a 180 degree turn. Both have clashed indirectly before when Remco made that comment about Groenewegen after his crash with Jacobsen. I think we will see more of this in the future and Remco will probably end up being the "bad guy" every single time, not because of who he his but due to his direct style of communication. If you can't do good after putting aside your own ambitions and going all-in for the team, there is little more you can do besides keeping your mouth shut. However, I think (and hope) he will never do that.
Are you sorry? It seems rather you want to continue to remind us all of one idiotic thing he did, no? I'm sure glad cell phone cameras weren't around when I was that age. The purity test thing is getting a bit out of hand. It is possible to be a very nice person and still have done something like this. I don't think people need to be pilloried for one episode of wrong-think or wrong-doing every time their name is mentioned.Sorry to bring this up again, but I'm annoyed by the man's standing...
Sorry to be mildly face blind but is the rider looking like "wtf are you doing?" your beloved Alvaro, or is it the Vakoc that went to Alpecin?
Are you sorry? It seems rather you want to continue to remind us all of one idiotic thing he did, no? I'm sure glad cell phone cameras weren't around when I was that age. The purity test thing is getting a bit out of hand. It is possible to be a very nice person and still have done something like this. I don't think people need to be pilloried for one episode of wrong-think or wrong-doing every time their name is mentioned.
I think any rider should be given a freedom that if put in a position where he can with a certain degree of probability go for the win, he can go for it. Especially in the context of national teams where riders are not actually paid to do domestique service… However Remco asked his coach beforehand if he is allowed to win in that case - and the question itself implies he would be seeking that kind of position for himself, quite possibly at the expense of work ping for Wout. Maybe that’s the reason the coach said no - to try to ensure Remco would indeed be working for Wout instead of focusing of getting his chance.
Ironically, that’s what he ended up doing in my opinion. The way I understood the race was Remco actually didn’t just cover the attacks and make Italians work but rather than that he was looking for a position where it would be impossible for his coach to deny him to go for it… only after 58 km to go did Remco completely commit to the Wout cause.
And by the way, I totally agree with Remco’s approach to be honest. After all, Wout was not honest by hiding the fact he doesn’t have the legs, so Remco was maybe not completely honest when he was supposedly working for Wout while in reality he was looking for his own opportunities. The consequence was that Remco was not available at the end to help Wout but from perspective of wanting Wout to win, it wouldn’t matter anyway because Wout didn’t have the legs to win. He wouldn’t be beaten just by Alpaphilippe anyway… It would however, matter from the perspective of wanting Belgian team to win because if Remco hadn’t burnt himself trying to look for opportunities 180 km to go, he could have attacked himself once Wout finally admitted he didn’t have the legs…
So what Wout should focus on here is not if Remco did in fact sincerely work for him all the time but rather than that answer a question why was he hiding the fact he had bad legs for so long. This actually did cost the Belgian team potential victory as opposed to how Remco was riding. But what “scares” me to a certain extent is that this question doesn’t even seem to cross Wout’s mind. He is a very rare case of self-absorbed person it appears…
You don't always know it all day. Riders often say they only know the best days when they hit the final.I'm not so sure about him not knowing he has bad legs. With HRMs and power meters, they can evaluate their absolute performance now - they don't need to wait to start losing ground relative to others before they know they have a bad day anymore...
We don't know if Evenepoel told the 100% truth in that talk show. Yes, Evenepoel was almost soft-spoken and appeared quite humble, but he knows how the media works by now. He's not this new kid on the block anymore. He, like WVA, knows exactly what he's doing. He knew those questions were coming. That he would be provoked.I find it highly peculiar that Van Aert is responding to Evenepoel, as if Evenepoel personally insulted Van Aert. Evenepoel simply answered questions that were asked by the talkshow host and other guests and did that quite serenely. He didn't lay blame on Van Aert, but simply said what happened and his words implicated the national coach much rather than Van Aert.
"he should have said earlier he wasnt feeling good". That's exactly what it's about. That's makes the difference between a great champion and a good rider. Meanwhile in Belgium it has become more and more clear on the basis of testimonials and reconstructions that it was actually the intention of the national coach and Van Aert to simply eliminate Evenepoel. Which is very mean. And forgetting that they also eliminated Van Aert as well. Because even with good legs Van Aert wouldn't have beaten Ala like that, without the help of Evenepoel in the final. Furthermore, it is a fact that in Belgium the tenor has completely changed. The national coach has lost his credit. And Evenepoel is now the new favorite of the neutral Belgians.How did Van Aert not act as leader? How should he have acted? Other than "he should have said earlier he wasnt feeling good".
Instead he actually committed to his leadership all the way to the end. I think a lot of people are twisting this to be selfish of him, but from another perspective it is also about not giving up and doing your best with the given opportunity. It easy to say he shouldnt have had that leadership, just because he didnt win. He took that pressure on himself though, and that is what a leader does.
Van Aert was in the finale of the race with a small group of riders. All on the limit. Maybe he still hoped there was a chance. It is not easy to stop and think in the moment about how you are feeling compared to everyone else. To be able to judge or gauge it. At that moment, you gotta just commit to the cause. You only know when someone accelerate like Ala did, and you cant follow, that it is too late. It was not your day.
I also honestly think Remco drove himself into pieces just to show how strong he was. Whether that was eagerness from his side, bad communication or bad tactics from the team... can be discussed until the end of time.
It was his first WC road race as a pro, that he finished. His time will come and he surely gained a lot of experience from this race and the EC race before that.
I think we will see him in the rainbow colors one day.
So what Wout should focus on here is not if Remco did in fact sincerely work for him all the time but rather than that answer a question why was he hiding the fact he had bad legs for so long. This actually did cost the Belgian team potential victory as opposed to how Remco was riding. But what “scares” me to a certain extent is that this question doesn’t even seem to cross Wout’s mind. He is a very rare case of self-absorbed person it appears…
Can we be sure that Remco pulling 180-100 km to go was not in fact Remco (at least partly) going rogue? Because that would mean it was not in fact Belgium's tactics but Remco's looking for opportunities... But I think until this point in time - Wout would have surely pointed that out already.The only explanation for Belgium's egregious tactical error, is that Van Aert was able to apply the necessary pressure to bear and make Vanthourenhout cave into to his every will in ensuring that under no circumstances was Remco to be in a position to win, even if that meant loosing everything for Belgium as was the case. If this was (likely) the case, then Van Aert is a selfish, arrogant and mean-spirited rider.
It definitely has to be Remco’s fault somehow!Can we be sure that Remco pulling 180-100 km to go was not in fact Remco (at least partly) going rogue? Because that would mean it was not in fact Belgium's tactics but Remco's looking for opportunities... But I think until this point in time - Wout would have surely pointed that out already.
What if Roglic seems happier at Vuelta than at Tour cause there's no Wout van Aert to bully him?That's the sense I've gotten from his interviews. He seems to think the world owes him something, but the world doesn't owe anybody anything. Every race is a new story and you need to prove you have the form to be the leader, especially in national team situations when nobody is paid to work for anybody. Rather it's only the call of duty and responsibility within reason (which is why you must have a plan B) that are the biding requisites. Wout also seems the type who would bully those around him if he suspected disloyalty, except that probably wouldn't work with Remco who can defend himself fiercely.
I believe Remco was doing what he was told in entering into the early breaks and working from 180k out, to make other nations work hard to pull him back. Again he was deployed from 50 k out to augment the front group's lead and deter further attacks, but Belgium's use of Remco is inexplicable by any tactical standards. For he should have been told to just shepherd Van Aert till the last 50 k and then play the stopper's role from there until the Leuven circuits, at which point he very well could have been prepared to take Stuyven's position, when Wout finally admitted he was not on the best of days.
The only explanation for Belgium's egregious tactical error, is that Van Aert was able to apply the necessary pressure to bear and make Vanthourenhout cave into to his every will in ensuring that under no circumstances was Remco to be in a position to win, even if that meant loosing everything for Belgium as was the case. If this was (likely) the case, then Van Aert is a selfish, arrogant and mean-spirited rider.
I totally agree. What you explain here and what I did before, was clearly the case. Vanthourenhout and Van Aert had an agreement to make it impossible for Evenepoel to win the race (and indeed to make it impossible to bring Evenepoel in a position to win the race). I don't think they had the idea it could mean that everything could be wrong for Belgium. Luckily this happened, so that it became clear how bad and false the national coach's course tactics wereThat's the sense I've gotten from his interviews. He seems to think the world owes him something, but the world doesn't owe anybody anything. Every race is a new story and you need to prove you have the form to be the leader, especially in national team situations when nobody is paid to work for anybody. Rather it's only the call of duty and responsibility within reason (which is why you must have a plan B) that are the biding requisites. Wout also seems the type who would bully those around him if he suspected disloyalty, except that probably wouldn't work with Remco who can defend himself fiercely.
I believe Remco was doing what he was told in entering into the early breaks and working from 180k out, to make other nations work hard to pull him back. Again he was deployed from 50 k out to augment the front group's lead and deter further attacks, but Belgium's use of Remco is inexplicable by any tactical standards. For he should have been told to just shepherd Van Aert till the last 50 k and then play the stopper's role from there until the Leuven circuits, at which point he very well could have been prepared to take Stuyven's position, when Wout finally admitted he was not on the best of days.
The only explanation for Belgium's egregious tactical error, is that Van Aert was able to apply the necessary pressure to bear and make Vanthourenhout cave into to his every will in ensuring that under no circumstances was Remco to be in a position to win, even if that meant loosing everything for Belgium as was the case. If this was (likely) the case, then Van Aert is a selfish, arrogant and mean-spirited rider.
If it was to punish Evenepoel for his comportment at the Olympic road race, then we can ad vendictive to that list.What if Roglic seems happier at Vuelta than at Tour cause there's no Wout van Aert to bully him?
Not going rogue per se, but IMO it was clear that he was looking for opportunities for himself and hoping the race situation would sort itself out. There was no need to neutralize the Cosnefroy threat (lol). Cosnefroy is a very good rider, but attacking at like 200k out (lol), give me a freaking break.Can we be sure that Remco pulling 180-100 km to go was not in fact Remco (at least partly) going rogue? Because that would mean it was not in fact Belgium's tactics but Remco's looking for opportunities... But I think until this point in time - Wout would have surely pointed that out already.
I'm just joking. I don't doubt Van Aert wanted certain assurances after the ORR, and he could make these demands based on his form and previous performances in the ORR and WCRR.If it was to punish Evenepoel for his comportment at the Olympic road race, then we can ad vendictive to that list.
To answer your question with another question: not being the stuff of a grand tour champion what reason would Wout have to bully?
After the Olympics, no way. Plus it would have come out by now, had Remco gone rogue. After the Olympics and Merckx's comments, Remco would have been crucified in the Belgian press for any deviation from the plan. That he has especially not been accused by Van Aert and his DS of this, means we can safely conclude that Evenepoel was just following orders.Can we be sure that Remco pulling 180-100 km to go was not in fact Remco (at least partly) going rogue? Because that would mean it was not in fact Belgium's tactics but Remco's looking for opportunities... But I think until this point in time - Wout would have surely pointed that out already.
It depends on what was precisely communicated. My guess is Vanthourenhout was sufficiently vague about which breaks to react to for Evenepoel to have leeway to do whatever he likes within the boundaries of "neutralizing dangerous attacks".Not going rogue per se, but IMO it was clear that he was looking for opportunities for himself and hoping the race situation would sort itself out. There was no need to neutralize the Cosnefroy threat (lol). Cosnefroy is a very good rider, but attacking at like 200k out (lol), give me a freaking break.
What's funny to me is that almost everyone in Flanders thinks Evenepoel was the perfect teammate in this race. That any tactical errors on his part were because of Vanthourenhout's stupidity or Van Aert's vindictiveness.
That's the sense I've gotten from his interviews. He seems to think the world owes him something, but the world doesn't owe anybody anything. Every race is a new story and you need to prove you have the form to be the leader, especially in national team situations when nobody is paid to work for anybody. Rather it's only the call of duty and responsibility within reason (which is why you must have a plan B) that are the biding requisites. Wout also seems the type who would bully those around him if he suspected disloyalty, except that probably wouldn't work with Remco who can defend himself fiercely.
I believe Remco was doing what he was told in entering into the early breaks and working from 180k out, to make other nations work hard to pull him back. Again he was deployed from 50 k out to augment the front group's lead and deter further attacks, but Belgium's use of Remco is inexplicable by any tactical standards. For he should have been told to just shepherd Van Aert till the last 50 k and then play the stopper's role from there until the Leuven circuits, at which point he very well could have been prepared to take Stuyven's position, when Wout finally admitted he was not on the best of days.
The only explanation for Belgium's egregious tactical error, is that Van Aert was able to apply the necessary pressure to bear and make Vanthourenhout cave into to his every will in ensuring that under no circumstances was Remco to be in a position to win, even if that meant loosing everything for Belgium as was the case. If this was (likely) the case, then Van Aert is a selfish, arrogant and mean-spirited rider.