Mike Cross said:
Some many months ago, you advertised for writers and commentators among whom a complete command of the English language was required. Reading tonight's article on the return of the Giro to the Zoncolan in 2011 exhibits clearly that you still need them. Cadel as "the Australia" and others. It spoils the reading experience. Don't your people read what they write before publication?
(1) "Some many months ago" already noted
(2) No comma needed after "ago"
(3) "among whom" sounds forced and convoluted - why not just replace with "who had" and eliminate "was required"?
(4) "clearly exhibits" preferable to "exhibits clearly"
(5) Sentence fragments (3rd to last sentence) generally only appropriate in feature-type writing
I would rate your writing a C- at best.
BTW, my pet peeve is the overuse of the word "infamous" when what is really meant is "famous." Unless there is something nefarious about what is being described, it is not infamous. A good example is LeMond's victory over Fignon, often described as infamous. Also: "ironic" for "coincidental," and "disinterested (meaning "objective") for "uninterested."