• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Tirreno-Adriatico 2025, March 10-16

Page 33 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Plenty of rules. Fair play rules, no pre arranged deals and one that says you need to defend your OWN chances. Collusion is strictly forbidden. But it obviously can't be proven and you can always spin it like Ganna is defending his own chances in the end, even when we all know he's just there to help out his friend.

I think in the past 1 time the UCI actually punished for someone blatantly helping someone from another team, but it's a long time ago, and it was just some random time penalty that didn't matter anyways.
It was Richie Porte and Simon Clarke iirc
 
Indeed, you are right (I'll cite the rule seeing that you declined to)


But proving it would be a thing:
Milan: "I'm a sprinter, I was interested in the points at the intermediate"
Ganna: "It's a race, surely if I can be near the front that is to be expected of me"

I didn't decline to I just didn't look it up.
Also, the fact that it's hard to prove doesn't mean we need to applaud pretty obvious collusion cause it's some nice guys doing it. I am not here screaming for the UCI to punish them lmao, but making it a normal thing would be wrong and dangerous.
 
Fairly nasty crash in the sprint, surprisingly not many riders stayed down.. Jamming into a gas station, riders at 60+ k on the sidewalk!! Maybe new issue for UCI is having corners wide enough, clearly marked that the best riders on the planet are not going off to improve the last few kilometers before the finish!!!
 
I didn't decline to I just didn't look it up.
Also, the fact that it's hard to prove doesn't mean we need to applaud pretty obvious collusion cause it's some nice guys doing it. I am not here screaming for the UCI to punish them lmao, but making it a normal thing would be wrong and dangerous.
I don't think mutually beneficial collaboration counts as collusion.
 
I don't think mutually beneficial collaboration counts as collusion.

So we're believing they did not talk about it? Ganna would not have done what he did in the last kilometers if it wasn't for Milan being a friend. At this point UAE can just ask Alpecin to ride for them on the flat in mountain stages and they can give them 2 guys extra in flat stages. That's also "mutually beneficial". You can always spin something into being mutually beneficial. It's not like they don't know there are operating in a grey zone. There's a reason why Milan avoided questions about if afterwards.

But like I said, I don't care about instances like this, but it's a bit of slippery slope that could turn into very bad and unfair things.
 
So we're believing they did not talk about it? Ganna would not have done what he did in the last kilometers if it wasn't for Milan being a friend. At this point UAE can just ask Alpecin to ride for them on the flat in mountain stages and they can give them 2 guys extra in flat stages. That's also "mutually beneficial". You can always spin something into being mutually beneficial. It's not like they don't know there are operating in a grey zone. There's a reason why Milan avoided questions about if afterwards.

But like I said, I don't care about instances like this, but it's a bit of slippery slope that could turn into very bad and unfair things.
But cycling is also a sport where you naturally ride with opponents in your wheel, technically helping opponents every time you take a pull. So the burden of proof is very difficult and muddy.

With Porte getting a wheel there is no doubt. But the stuff today I don't think they can really punish riders for.
 
A bit of a non stage for the end, but great win by Milan, confirming he's the best sprinter. And Ayuso basically won GC yesterday on the one climb and that was that.

GmLTnxdXoAAlI6L


GmLXZrkaAAAs0AM


GmLXr6eX0AAnS_p


GmLZH02WoAAwauG


GmLW6EqWcAEWcru


GmK9IVWXIAALZov
 
Overall the shorter, but still decently steep MTF led to more active racing on the other stages. Now of course the hilly stage that was right before the MTF should be replaced by a proper Murito stage (even better if it's the day after the MTF) but the overall design of the route (opening ITT, hilly stages, one really long MSR training stage and something like stage 4 that gave both attackers and sprinters a chance) is imo good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: search
Overall the shorter, but still decently steep MTF led to more active racing on the other stages. Now of course the hilly stage that was right before the MTF should be replaced by a proper Murito stage (even better if it's the day after the MTF) but the overall design of the route (opening ITT, hilly stages, one really long MSR training stage and something like stage 4 that gave both attackers and sprinters a chance) is imo good.
The route has been worse since it was moved to Mon-Sun. And even only comparing this year against those editions, it was still quite poor. Only 2023 didn't have the MTF as the last GC stage, but while it had the best hilly stage, the strong headwind the day before made the GC situation bad for Osimo. Because of San Giacomo last year, I'd even say this was the worst route. Had they done the original stages though, I think it'd have been on par with the other recent ones.

I'd much rather have the opening sprint and final ITT like in 2021 than the other way around as it has been since then.
 
Overall the shorter, but still decently steep MTF led to more active racing on the other stages. Now of course the hilly stage that was right before the MTF should be replaced by a proper Murito stage (even better if it's the day after the MTF) but the overall design of the route (opening ITT, hilly stages, one really long MSR training stage and something like stage 4 that gave both attackers and sprinters a chance) is imo good.
This MTF would be great for a 1st Giro week too, though maybe everyone is too passive at that point. Alternatively it's fun as mid 3rd week unipuerto
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mayomaniac