The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
BroDeal said:
BroDeal said:So the name will live on, but will it be the same? Planet X appears to be value oriented rather than high end.
Isn't buying a mountain bike from the UK like buying ice from Egypt?![]()
On-One frames are not catalog designs with new decals. Each one is unique to On-One and designed in England (if you think there in no mtbing in the UK you have not been paying attention). The emphasis is on providing a bike that performs well at a price you can afford. Design standards, materials and build quality is similar to the major brands with the cost saving of user direct sales.DirtyWorks said:Nothing I'm seeing on their website suggests they do anything other than reselling Asian-sourced equipment. Looking at the Titus bikes, I don't see anything that isn't built by the OEM's in China or Taiwan. It looks like the deal gives On One the volume they need to get into full suspension mountain bikes with an OEM.
If the new owner is charitable to Titus' customers any warranty issues will be handled by making whatever their OEM builds for them available at a low replacement cost. They don't have to be charitable. Many distressed sales like this are not kind to the previous owner's customers.
You can now buy slight variations of the same bike from bikesdirect, Kona, Blue, Condor, and now Titus/On One. There are others bike brands that fit in this category too. It's just that these are very obvious OEM'd product.
shiggy said:On-One frames are not catalog designs with new decals. Each one is unique to On-One and designed in England
I've never said there wasn't. On One gets some OEM volume with the Titus deal. That's the only claim I made.shiggy said:(if you think there in no mtbing in the UK you have not been paying attention).
Eeerily similar to bikesdirect... Could it be On One is doing what BikesDirect does only the home market is the UK? It's not a bad business model. However, trying to sell the idea that some bike design magic happens at On One is dishonest. Maybe On One's component mix ends up being a product that has better market acceptance. Good for On One. However, it's not 'R&D' magic. Selling the idea ordering from an OEM is R&D magic is, for me, dishonest.shiggy said:The emphasis is on providing a bike that performs well at a price you can afford. Design standards, materials and build quality is similar to the major brands with the cost saving of user direct sales.
Titus wasn't? What about the thousands of other small businesses trying to make it in their chosen sports business? Most of them fail too. Breaking news: 'loving bikes' is not a precursor to making a successful product/business. In fact, from the business side, it's a hindrance.shiggy said:This is a company of people that love bikes, ride bikes, design bikes, and make a living doing it.
Why not? It's the essence of what On One does. It's not a bad thing. Great product comes out of Taiwan and China. It's not innovative, but it can be very good. If Titus had U.S. production, then it would be **very** expensive to keep compared to sourcing from an Asian OEM. It would be great if they did keep it, but wow that would be expensive.shiggy said:Titus will live on and there is no intension to just rebadge other designs as Titus.
Except "supported" can mean lots of things ranging from actually making Titus' previous customers happy to generally abandoning them as 'legacy product.' The wordier the communique, the more likely legacy customers will be abandoned.shiggy said:Except for this: Current Titus owners will be supported and US production is a high priority. More info with be released as it is known in coming days.
-shiggy
Same factories, yes. Same designs, no. All On-One frame designs are by and for On-One and no one else.DirtyWorks said:And then produced by an OEM in China or Taiwan. The same OEM's do most bikes. Don't obfuscate the simple facts On One buys OEM built in the same jigs with the same jig constraints as the rest of the Western resellers.
On-One does sell user direct, which allows us to offer good bikes at a great value.Eeerily similar to bikesdirect... Could it be On One is doing what BikesDirect does only the home market is the UK? It's not a bad business model. However, trying to sell the idea that some bike design magic happens at On One is dishonest. Maybe On One's component mix ends up being a product that has better market acceptance. Good for On One. However, it's not 'R&D' magic. Selling the idea ordering from an OEM is R&D magic is, for me, dishonest.
Yes, Titus was. At least until the investment companies bought into it.Titus wasn't? What about the thousands of other small businesses trying to make it in their chosen sports business? Most of them fail too. Breaking news: 'loving bikes' is not a precursor to making a successful product/business. In fact, from the business side, it's a hindrance.
No, it is not what we do. I repeat: On-One frames are designed by us, for us. There is no rebadging of any "catalog" frame for public sale.Why not? It's the essence of what On One does. It's not a bad thing. Great product comes out of Taiwan and China. It's not innovative, but it can be very good. If Titus had U.S. production, then it would be **very** expensive to keep compared to sourcing from an Asian OEM. It would be great if they did keep it, but wow that would be expensive.
We are not following the GT/Pacific model. Nobody will be abandoned.Except "supported" can mean lots of things ranging from actually making Titus' previous customers happy to generally abandoning them as 'legacy product.' The wordier the communique, the more likely legacy customers will be abandoned.
Planet X / On-One has an very open development process. You will be able to see it all.To keep a reselling business viable, the first priority is to buy low and sell high. Unless legacy Titus customers are buying On One product, supporting legacy Titus customers is a luxury.
A wait and see approach is probably best.
shiggy said:The "loving bikes" part is important, as it means we understand the industry better than the non-industry investment firms, such as those that in the past have bought Schwinn, GT, Cannondale...
Rip:30 said:Not that we need to pile on these guys anymore, but DirtyWorks articulated everything I find ridiculous and frustrating about the bike industry.
When I hear stuff about the company employees loving bikes and riding, I usually think--oh their products are probably over priced because they are out riding instead of working half the time. I want a company where the employees "love mechanical engineering and material sciences", not riding bikes and coming up with marketing BS.
Boeing said:
The Carbon 29er Race pictured above will be shipping to riders in Feb '11.flyor64 said:Oh that's nifty. Is a "soon to be available" or "never gonna happen" frame?
I ask only because I will upgrade my 29er frame next season and buying for the UK is a realistic option...
Boeing said:All the humanistic hogwash aside, it is a good business move.
on one not innovative enough for you lot?
well this looks pretty sweet. but you euros and commonwealth chest beaters can't grasp the 29er
![]()
picture by way of the man, guitar Ted at http://www.twentynineinches.com
Rip:30 said:Looks like a road bike.
Boeing said:"love mechanical engineering and material sciences" qualifies as marketing BS you bought hook line and sinker
stinker
BroDeal said:The angular centers of the tubes make it look like the typical no-name frame that you can buy direct from Taiwan.
flyor64 said:Not to sound too obtuse, but this isn't the first time I've heard "buy cheap direct from Taiwan and/or China".
How much substance is there to this?
BroDeal said:snipped for brevity