forty four said:exactly i dont see what him doping has anything to do with being a good coach he was a highly accomplished cyclist in his time. people on here seem to think you can dope and just lay around and still be good. they improve performance but you have to have skill beyond that. a genetically gifted athlete will still easily beat a doped to the gills genetically inferior athlete its that simple. tyler was a good tough rider i would certainly think he could be a very useful coach.
I'm going to call bs on this.
LeMond had and has revolutionary training ideas. A lot less volume but a lot more intensity. You know, bang for the buck.
He outlined those ideas in the LeMond special edition of Pro Cycling about a year and a half ago.
The kind of crap/Ped's TH was doing allowed idiotic training volumes and enabled recovery.
Obviously, the goal is to stimulate gains while allowing the body to recover from them.
Riding 40,000 k a year is just destroying the meat and is moronic.
It completely effs up hormone levels which becomes a death spiral.