The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
From a first look that is only the PCS points, but not the UCI points ?You can find riders' scores for the current year by going to the team current year score on PCS (here), then click on the team total in the right hand column to get their riders' individual points for 2022, but that will give you a team by team run down rather than one comprehensive table.
Firstcycling has one as well https://firstcycling.com/m/ranking.php?d=2&y=2022CQ is the only one I know to just get the year so far ranking. Pretty sure Brailsford has said it's the ranking he uses to help determine riders to sign, something to do with the more modern UCI ranking is distorted to really know who's going well.
![]()
But this not based on UCI POINTS, just their own points system, isn't it?CQ is the only one I know to just get the year so far ranking. Pretty sure Brailsford has said it's the ranking he uses to help determine riders to sign, something to do with the more modern UCI ranking is distorted to really know who's going well.
![]()
I only see the 52 weeks version. Do I miss something?
I miss something: 4 people have tried to help you, and you have not given any acknowledgement or thanks, just a moan on each occasion that no-one has directed you to something that you have not established exists. So I miss a sense of manners and politeness.Do I miss something?
It's basically a kind of successor to the old UCI-ranking. ie before UCI's ProTour and that disaster of repackaging and relabelling the same thing ever since. Easy-enough to do your own ranking, all the results are out there these days to do it.But this not based on UCI POINTS, just their own points system, isn't it?