I know that we have touched on this in one or two of the other threads but what do people think about the weighting given to the US 'cross events on the UCI calendar?
Clearly, cross has experienced a huge increase in popularity in N America and the UCI is presumably attempting to recognise this by awarding ranking points to the US events.
But, to see TJ (or was it Page?) on the front row of the grid today at Koksijde and then compare his finishing position is surely making a mockery of the rankings as well as impacting on more competitive riders' ability to influence the front of the race?
TJ is/was ranked 5th in the UCI list before the start of today - is it time for a rethink?
Clearly, cross has experienced a huge increase in popularity in N America and the UCI is presumably attempting to recognise this by awarding ranking points to the US events.
But, to see TJ (or was it Page?) on the front row of the grid today at Koksijde and then compare his finishing position is surely making a mockery of the rankings as well as impacting on more competitive riders' ability to influence the front of the race?
TJ is/was ranked 5th in the UCI list before the start of today - is it time for a rethink?