I have posted below the problems that foreigners have with getting UCI licences in Thailand. A problem that the UCI willfully refuses to acknowledge. Now we have more evidence of malpractice which 100% breaches UCI rules and the Olympic Charter at the Thai Cycling Association:
1. Licences should be issued to overseas riders living in a country other than their own. This year the Thais have asked foreigners to pay 5 x more than locals for this licence (breaches Article 3 of the UCI Constitution). They have also asked for evidence of residence. One rider paid the full amount, produced evidence (ie House book and visa stamps) as required but was refused a licence.
2. A Race in Thailand that awarded UCI points had a number of foreigners on the podium (photographic evidence) however the result submitted to the UCI was not the same as the actual result. There were no foreigners in their listing to the UCI, thus denying UCI points to overseas riders and garnering more points for themselves.
3. A non-Thai rider and UCI licence holder won two time trials held under UCI rules. The evidence that we have is the time that he was given was doctored so that the win went to a Thai rider not a foreigner.
4. A rider with half Thai nationality was given slower times in a UCI track meet for the 200m than he actually recorded so that he was unable to contest the finals against 100% Thais.
Make of this what you will. I am putting the evidence together in a dossier to present to the UCI. But so far Brian Cookson is refusing to get involved in this serious issue. Why?
1. Licences should be issued to overseas riders living in a country other than their own. This year the Thais have asked foreigners to pay 5 x more than locals for this licence (breaches Article 3 of the UCI Constitution). They have also asked for evidence of residence. One rider paid the full amount, produced evidence (ie House book and visa stamps) as required but was refused a licence.
2. A Race in Thailand that awarded UCI points had a number of foreigners on the podium (photographic evidence) however the result submitted to the UCI was not the same as the actual result. There were no foreigners in their listing to the UCI, thus denying UCI points to overseas riders and garnering more points for themselves.
3. A non-Thai rider and UCI licence holder won two time trials held under UCI rules. The evidence that we have is the time that he was given was doctored so that the win went to a Thai rider not a foreigner.
4. A rider with half Thai nationality was given slower times in a UCI track meet for the 200m than he actually recorded so that he was unable to contest the finals against 100% Thais.
Make of this what you will. I am putting the evidence together in a dossier to present to the UCI. But so far Brian Cookson is refusing to get involved in this serious issue. Why?