- Mar 13, 2009
- 5,245
- 2
- 0
I think most cycling sponsors are idealists or cycling-nuts because it is difficult to determine any concrete commercial gain from the sponsorship.
Personally I chose Bouygues as my mobile provider and rented a car with Europcar. FDJ makes sense as well since they mainly do sports gambling. I thought Columbia was a pretty good idea because they make outdoor clothing.
But as others have said before Liquigas, Phonak, Quick Step, Agritubel, Silence, Omega Pharma, that Iranian Petrochemical sponsor ... probably get nothing out of it, compared to what they invest.
That's why IMO it doesn't matter in most cases whether it's a commercial sponsor or a conglommerate such as Katusha or Astana, or a billionaire such as Leopard.
Then you also have sponsors such as Skoda who provide cars for many European races, I wonder how many people have bought a Skoda because of that
Personally I chose Bouygues as my mobile provider and rented a car with Europcar. FDJ makes sense as well since they mainly do sports gambling. I thought Columbia was a pretty good idea because they make outdoor clothing.
But as others have said before Liquigas, Phonak, Quick Step, Agritubel, Silence, Omega Pharma, that Iranian Petrochemical sponsor ... probably get nothing out of it, compared to what they invest.
That's why IMO it doesn't matter in most cases whether it's a commercial sponsor or a conglommerate such as Katusha or Astana, or a billionaire such as Leopard.
Then you also have sponsors such as Skoda who provide cars for many European races, I wonder how many people have bought a Skoda because of that