Alex Simmons/RST said:I'd say it's valid that everyone has an opinion.
MMmmm... that's deep... and profoundly egalitarian.
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Alex Simmons/RST said:I'd say it's valid that everyone has an opinion.
GrilledFish said:I was at the gym tonight and a 55+ guy who had be training 30 years(!) with some work hard spin cycling work till you vomit guy was asking about weight lifting for cycling - for the first time.
Whichever way you feel about this, how about trying both before you are an old dude. Just saying...
Alex Simmons/RST said:I have. I was stronger but I went slower.
VeloFidelis said:How ironic...
Alex Simmons/RST said:Not really. I'm talking track sprint BTW. From a aerobic POV the impact was worse.
My neuromuscular power only improved when I, shock horror, did focussed track sprint training work such as lots of standing starts and flying sprints of many varieties.
Once my leg got chopped off, well I never really bothered too much with that sort of training, save the occasional sprint efforts one might normally do in their routine or when having a little fun at the track, and racing of course.
The real irony is that I won as many road/crit sprints after as I had with two whole legs, I just had to be smarter and do it from breakaways. And despite the significant drop in strength that accompanied my amputation, my aerobic power improved (e.g. I set an all time PB power output at UCI paracycling world cup time trial).
YMMV
kielbasa said:So Alex, what would be the most beneficial calf exercises to improve cycling?
Alex Simmons/RST said:I have. I was stronger but I went slower.
GrilledFish said:It seems many sports where speed is important, and pay well, also use weights. What do you think makes cycling different?
42x16ss said:Coaching is SO subjective, there are many, many ways to get to your goals, not just one clear cut path. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that's what Alex has been trying to say for most of the thread. Knowing a little bit about his reputation and clientele I know I'm inclined to listen.
I posted Peter. He does well.DirtyWorks said:This is exactly right. *For me* volume only made me skinny. Intensity did not increase my power. I got very good at riding near threshold.
When I go to the gym and do squats, deadlifts and more, I have more power (speed!!!) than I ever had. However, it's not a 1:1 experience. I have to do some hours and turn the gym power into cycling endurance power.
I'm definitely not saying Alex is wrong.
42x16ss said:Is this the chart?
Alex Simmons/RST said:What matters is how much power a rider can sustain, and especially expressed as a ratio to their body mass and also to their coefficient of drag area.
Hence why I use a power output as a cycling performance measurement - it is far more useful and instructive, as well as being readily available and convenient.
O2 utilisation capacity is enhanced with endurance training, and not by weights. This is really basic stuff and well established in the literature.