Re: Re:
Nellyspania said:
42x16ss said:
proffate said:
chris boardman? quit cycling because of low T, supposedly.
In the year 2000, at the young age of 32, after winning the TdF prologue 3 times, Dauphine prologue several times, ITT world's + several other medals, Romandie prologue, GP des Nations, 2 x Duo Normand, 2 x Pursuit WC's and 2 x hour records - almost all during the unrestricted EPO years....
Uh huh
I see where you're coming from as regards the exceptional results but the 50% rule was in force from 1997; in my mind if Boardman was EPO'd or BB'd to the limit by a doctor surely he would also would be looking to increase his low testosterone to a more 'normal' level thus improving his poor form in GT's etc.
Of course I do accept the possibility that the 'Massive engine/Low T' story may have been a fabrication.
I think the "Boardman - clean" argument was a lot more potent a few years ago when we knew less about doping and people were less cynical. In 2009, a lot of players we now all agree doped were still regarded as possibly clean.
Even only 1 year ago Paula Radcliffe was being defended quite a lot on here and many of us were hesitant to accuse her too much.
Now we know Paula doped. That ridiculous record, we should have known all along, could not have been acheived without EPO and some BS pr stunts with a no EPO sign don't change that.
To me Boardman is the same. Deep down we all know its extremely unlikely that he was beating all his EPO pals clean in the era of mass doping. Plausible explanations have been put forward to try and hold the line against this.
At the end of the day he was ready to get on the gravy train for every doper. Indurain who everyone knew was a doper, Boardman had nothing but praise for. Lance - "he's one of the most tested athletes in the world - what more can he do than pass test after test?"
Froome now, he's asked on ITV what he thinks of the scepticism and he won't even aknowledge the possibility. Froome is clean. Boardman knows this. Sky have the most money so buy the best riders.
Anyone who defended Lance and has not learnt their lesson, continues to deny cycling has a doping problem and claims to know guys like Froome are clean. You know full well where they stand.