Re: Re:
Hmm, I don't know if I agree. Yes, they are make for great racing and I certainly admire them for that, but how great was PR 2010 and 2012? Probably some of the most boring editions in modern times to be honest. Besides, Cancellara didn't do anything in PR last year as far as I remember.
SafeBet said:It could be this way, but it could also be like Buffalo Solider said: Cance and Boonen tend to make for great racing. Without them, since the other riders will think they have a better shot at winning, they could end up racing more conservatively.Hugo Koblet said:For Ronde van Vlaanderen, I think we have a nice crop of riders with almost equal chance of winning: GVA, Vanmarcke, Stybar, Sagan, Thomas and Kristoff. At the moment, I'd probably rate Kristoff and Sagan slightly below the others. I think the dynamics for a very good race is there. There's no clear favorite which bodes for an open race.
For Paris-Roubaix, again we have a few riders with almost equal chance of winning: Wiggins, Degenkolb, Kristoff, Stybar, Terpstra and Vanmarcke and then a lot of outsiders like Sagan, GVA, Thomas, Stannard etc.
I know that Cancellara (or Boonen) wasn't the big favorite he used to be, but the changed dynamics without these two might lead to some very interesting and entertaining races.
I still believe Sep has the best chance at winning it solo a la Cancellara. He tried it yesterday, was a bit unlucky. I put Stybar and G. Thomas in Tier 1 as well, at least for Ronde.
Etixx has all the cards to make both RVV and PR carnages. They're our best hope for great races.
Hmm, I don't know if I agree. Yes, they are make for great racing and I certainly admire them for that, but how great was PR 2010 and 2012? Probably some of the most boring editions in modern times to be honest. Besides, Cancellara didn't do anything in PR last year as far as I remember.