Arnout said:
Why? Do Catalunya, Luxembourg and Dauphiné and you get a higher level and no messing with jetlags and stuff.
What America should do is develop an own circuit (which it seems they're doing a bit, although some of the bigger races are always near a cancellation) and not bother with being a Tour prep to attract a few names. You don't create a solid racing circuit with that.
Catalunya is in late march now.
This year Romandie ended May 2nd. The Dauphine Libere started June 6th, the Tour de Suisse started June 12th.
In between those, the big race is of course the Giro. Other then that, there are races like 4 Jours de Dunkerque, Flèche du Sud, Tour de Picardie, Circuit de Lorraine, Bayern Rundfahrt, Tour of Belgium, and the Tour of Luxembourg... and other smaller races and assorted 1-day events.
As prep... I don't think those are exactly dominating. Many seem quite light on climbs. A few teams/riders already were willing with that schedule to come to the US for the Tour of California alone. Would some come a bit early and race something like Cascade or Gila a week before on the same trip? Maybe stay late and forego Luxembourg leading into the Tour of Switzerland, instead chosing to race Colorado or Utah?
I think they would. It's a big expense for riders who ride the big races (all of which are in europe) to come to the US. California does get some to make the trip... but few if any want to spend that money a SECOND time at a different point in the year to do another race. Why not take a group of existing races that are somewhat close geographically and put them on successive weeks? It would help domestic teams travel expenses too... so it's not like there is a downside if the bigger teams don't show.