The way the Wall Street Journal portrays the head of USAC, Weisel is using USAC as a way to generate personal gain. The low-end donation for wealthy cycling enthusiasts contribute to USACDF.
Wealthy cycling enthusiasts who were ready to commit USD$ 2.5 million got a chance to invest in Tailwind Sports. The WSJ article suggests the goal is/was to use USAC to develop talent for his privately held Tailwind Sports interests.
The question then becomes, how many other deals does he make where USAC is the lever he's using to enrich himself? For example, what kind of money does he stand to personally make from the Tour De Sandwich in Colorado? How much did he clear with Lance's appearances at the Tour of California?
Wealthy cycling enthusiasts who were ready to commit USD$ 2.5 million got a chance to invest in Tailwind Sports. The WSJ article suggests the goal is/was to use USAC to develop talent for his privately held Tailwind Sports interests.
The question then becomes, how many other deals does he make where USAC is the lever he's using to enrich himself? For example, what kind of money does he stand to personally make from the Tour De Sandwich in Colorado? How much did he clear with Lance's appearances at the Tour of California?