I can see him get there. He’s already well underway and still has to start going for big goals. I think he’s actually ahead of Pogacar and Evenepoel at his age.What are peoples thoughts on Kooij? Or do sprinters burn out too easily?
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
I can see him get there. He’s already well underway and still has to start going for big goals. I think he’s actually ahead of Pogacar and Evenepoel at his age.What are peoples thoughts on Kooij? Or do sprinters burn out too easily?
The poll needs an update.
No. GC wins do of course but not KOM or points.Do classification wins count?
Or youth. Or best Catalan. Or...No. GC wins do of course but not KOM or points.
The poll needs an update.
@Armchair cyclist can you fix?Yeah, but I don't think I can do that (at least in this thread).
Can’t you leave the poll but just add riders?I would much prefer to see this poll stay up, think it's an interesting snapshot of the collective wisdom of the forum at the time. If we need a new poll (and once every 20 months seems a bit much), then let's have a new thread.
A) you can't have more than 10 optionsCan’t you leave the poll but just add riders?
Hmm ok, then I don't think there's a proper solution for this, besides making a new topic every year.A) you can't have more than 10 options
B) even if you could, some of the options would be new when some aren't, which completely distorts the totals
Can we have the updated number of wins in the OP @tobydawq ?
No (for reasons Devil's Elbow gives above)@Armchair cyclist can you fix?
No (for reasons Devil's Elbow gives above)
I can edit the fields in the poll, but I doubt the wisdom of adding totals as of some random date in the middle of the season.
If I would make a poll now, I think I would keep Démare, Roglič, Pogačar, Evenepoel and Van der Poel. I would definitely flick Jakobsen and Ewan, probably also Groenewegen, Viviani and Van Aert. The latter is just too far away and is pushing 30 and doesn't do many small races, Viviani is close but is unlikely to win more than 1-2 races per season and Groenewegen just doesn't win much anymore.
Philipsen (45) is obviously the first replacement, then probably Pedersen (41) (although that would rely on him farming small races every February), Vingegaard (34) (I don't see it, he is too far away), Kooij (33) and De Lie (22).
I disagree with taking out Van Aert but not Van der Poel. Both are 29, Van der Poel only has three wins more, Van der Poel races less and basically completely focuses on big one day races whereas Van Aert is a contender for most stages in most races. Van der Poel is definitely the better cyclist but would need to focus on the road for a few years to get 100 wins. I don‘t think there‘s enough difference between the two to draw the line there. But I guess you need to make the cut somewhere. I would put Van Aert ahead of De Lie just because he‘s still far away and it‘s going too far into the future with an injury-prone rider to be relevant at the moment.If I would make a poll now, I think I would keep Démare, Roglič, Pogačar, Evenepoel and Van der Poel. I would definitely flick Jakobsen and Ewan, probably also Groenewegen, Viviani and Van Aert. The latter is just too far away and is pushing 30 and doesn't do many small races, Viviani is close but is unlikely to win more than 1-2 races per season and Groenewegen just doesn't win much anymore.
Philipsen (45) is obviously the first replacement, then probably Pedersen (41) (although that would rely on him farming small races every February), Vingegaard (34) (I don't see it, he is too far away), Kooij (33) and De Lie (22).
I disagree with taking out Van Aert but not Van der Poel. Both are 29, Van der Poel only has three wins more, Van der Poel races less and basically completely focuses on big one day races whereas Van Aert is a contender for most stages in most races. Van der Poel is definitely the better cyclist but would need to focus on the road for a few years to get 100 wins. I don‘t think there‘s enough difference between the two to draw the line there. But I guess you need to make the cut somewhere. I would put Van Aert ahead of De Lie just because he‘s still far away and it‘s going too far into the future with an injury-prone rider to be relevant at the moment.
Van Aert, Van der Poel, Pedersen and Vingegaard is simply never gonna happen imho. Van der Poel is only 4 months younger than Van Aert, Pedersen is a year younger iirc, Vingegaard is already 27 and waaaay off.Fair enough, I guess I am a little blinded by this spring.
But I think it's an exercise in futility as neither of those two will get particularly close to 100 wins.
I guess a thing in Van Aert's favour is that he still has such a disappointing palmares so that he has a bigger incentive to continue his career for longer than Van der Poel.
Vingegaard had 16 wins last year, he could conceivably do it but would have to pick the right races and stay dominant for a whileVan Aert, Van der Poel, Pedersen and Vingegaard is simply never gonna happen imho. Van der Poel is only 4 months younger than Van Aert, Pedersen is a year younger iirc, Vingegaard is already 27 and waaaay off.
I guess you could leave them in, not to upset some delusional fans, but if you leave one out, you should leave all of them out.