Still, it's a heavy load to bear and automatically provokes derision. Merxcks today would probably not win the Tour. And, so, the original title is a metaphorical provocation, which now has become an albatros.I think the previous thread titles were to mock those who still do not understand that the original title was chosen tongue in cheek based on his results as a junior (which were indeed better than Merckx at that age), those who are still triggered to point out he is not the new Merckx while it is abundantly clear there will never be another rider to match Merckx his palmares.
Last edited: