- Aug 2, 2010
- 1,502
- 0
- 0
Christian said:I hope he skips the ITT for the RR. Would be epic to see a battle between him and Breschel
after what we saw in MSR RVV and PR, why should he skip the ITT?
Christian said:I hope he skips the ITT for the RR. Would be epic to see a battle between him and Breschel
maltiv said:Probably true. Never a good idea to be the one and only favorite, particularly when you don't have a strong team.
You don't have to change much for Cancellera to have won all 3 monuments...In M-SR he was stopped by Goss who never has been that good before, in RVV he was stopped by Nuyens who never has been that good before and in P-R he was stopped by Van Summeren who has never been that good before. Surprisingly he is not riding the ardennes classics for a possible revenge. He is so good at the moment that I actually think he could've won one of them by attacking on the flat where no one who will be there in the ardennes can follow him.
Jamsque said:He skipped the ITT a couple of years back and it made no difference. I don't think the course in Copenhagen will be selective enough for Canc to have a chance.
Chuffy said:Just out of interest -what does HD stand for against a rider in the final standings? Thomas was HD, rather than DNF.
beer_thirty said:It's impossible to embarass ourselves here! It's the internet, where we are all completely anonymous!![]()
c&cfan said:does he need that? where were you in the monuments and E3? in top form, he doesnt even need to atack. he can just go TT mode in the last few KM. he isnt the main favourite after all. he does not need to work before that so he will be fresher. he can win this. (more evidence: 2007 tour.)
not only that, but why not do lombardia this year?
Christian said:I hope he skips the ITT for the RR. Would be epic to see a battle between him and Breschel
Jamsque said:He skipped the ITT a couple of years back and it made no difference. I don't think the course in Copenhagen will be selective enough for Canc to have a chance.
Michielveedeebee said:Naah, he should finally take the double. I really don't want to see Martin in the rainbow jersey...
Christian said:I haven't looked at the course yet but last year in Geelong he didn't have it in the RR anymore
Dekker_Tifosi said:Oh come on, artist on bikes? if they were, then they should know to KEEP THEIR DISTANCE
it's not that hard, it goes right in most races, why can't they never do it right in Roubaix... for crying out loud.
TV motors should not at any rate impact the direct result of the race. In my opinion, they did influence the result.
Michielveedeebee said:Mendrisio was waaaaay more difficult but he did have it in the RR there
Maxiton said:+1
That's how I read it, too. I wanted Cancellera to win, but could see he was too well marked. He had to wait until that lengthy rise came up, where he knew he could give it the gas and drop them, and did. By then it was too late, but just barely. Another k, maybe less, he'd have gotten back on.
As it is, though, I was glad to see Van Summeren win. He worked like a madman, and rode well. I have to say, when he was sharing the victory with his girlfriend/wife it broke me up a little.
Great display of tactics by Garmin, too: the world champion marking Cancellara, while his teammate in the lead group is given orders to gun it and go. Garmin used a team to beat a machine. The machine, meanwhile, fought bravely, got a well deserved second, and was gracious in defeat.
Even though my guy didn't win, I thought it was an exceptional race.
beer_thirty said:+1000000000
If Thor would have had the legs, does anyone really think he would not have loved to have been 2nd, complete the Garmin 1-2 finish, and 'show' everyone he could have won today?? Riding for Van Summeren, BS. He never would have won today no matter what the situation. He just hasn't had it all spring and did as much as he could have done today, and no more.
http://www.cyclismactu.net/news-paris_roubaix_boonen_j_ai_manque_a_cancellara-14318.html"I fell once in Paris-Roubaix, that was in 2003. Today, I had only bad luck. I felt good at the start, and I was able to preserve my energy. If I hadn't abandoned, the race would have gone differently. I think Cancellara missed me. On the other hand, other rouleurs have really managed the race badly, I'm thinking of Hushovd and Ballan who stayed passive. You have to try something in order to win Paris-Roubaix."
maltiv said:Cancellara would possibly have won had Boonen been there, because he would have been able to do some work to bridge up to the front group. Same with Hushovd, who also could've won with someone like Boonen there. His absence changed the whole race and it's impossible to know what would've happened with him there, I just know that the top 10 would've been completely different.
