luckyboy said:Olympic Road Race is going to be terrible no doubt
auscyclefan94 said:you really want to start this arguemnt? why do you need to bring up things that were discussed ages ago? Get lost you antagonistic little ****.
auscyclefan94 said:you really want to start this arguemnt? why do you need to bring up things that were discussed ages ago? Get lost you antagonistic little ****.
Timmy-loves-Rabo said:amen brother.
this really sucks.
i'd trade in cuddles winning next three tours for cav not winning
Waterloo Sunrise said:They led half the race and finished 2nd and 3rd. Most of his customers are British. Get over it.
auscyclefan94 said:i want to cry...that world championship was a disgrace but seeing cav win makes me want to cry.
GroupDK said:back it up. loose colored arguments..-for these life is to short..
pat mquaid..also stated that the world championship has newer been so succesfull and have so many spectators and been fullfilled in such a functionel fasion (and that has to be the benchmark, spectators its a show !!)
Denmark is only 5.5 mio.
people and one of the reason why Denmark was choosed is beacuse its the first and only bike city in the world, and a first to have it in a major city / kapital like that..
http://www.streetfilms.org/cycling-copenhagen-through-north-american-eyes/
and offcourse the human aspect of a democrazy works in Denmark (rank 1 world) ..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corruption_Perceptions_Index
http://www.worldaudit.org/polrights.htm
http://www.worldaudit.org/civillibs.htm
http://www.worldaudit.org/democracy.htm
We aint world champs in sport, but if there was a world championship for best country on the interaction human aspect..
Point out a country there is superior to Denmark these years and that Im proud of..
http://www.economist.com/comment/421352#comment-421352
and also the most happy people in the world with highest human rights.
University of Leicester:
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/emergingtech/the-first-world-map-of-happiness/305
University of Cambridge
http://news.admin.cam.ac.uk/news/2007/04/17/happydanesarehereagain
has not much to do with cycling, but still proud of these makrofactors, when we aint champs in cycling (yeah we got Saxo bank, but still)
woodie said:Someones cranky
hatcher said:If they had any other sprinter they wouldn't have used those tactics. I'm sure they were well aware it was going to be chaos in the last 2k, they just wanted to make sure there actually was a bunch sprint to be had.
Timmy-loves-Rabo said:The thing is, a world champion ship should repersent an epic effort. Not an epic effort of the team. Yes the team should play a big part, but it's lame that the first time the winner hits the wind is with 100m to go. Terrible course.
royalpig180 said:Sure has been interesting reading the hate that's been dished out in the last 10-15 pages...
I'm not too pleased with the result either, but the hate is uncalled for. The sprinters do deserve their chance to fight it out for the rainbow jersey just like the climbers or more versatile riders. Was it an exciting race to watch? Not particularly, but that's your fault for watching it then. It's not like we didn't know that there was a strong chance this could happen. The course was never going to be hard enough to really split things up.
auscyclefan94 said:you really want to start this arguemnt? why do you need to bring up things that were discussed ages ago? Get lost you antagonistic little ****.
auscyclefan94 said:you really want to start this arguemnt? why do you need to bring up things that were discussed ages ago? Get lost you antagonistic little ****.
Ferminal said:London will be better than this. Smaller teams - if they race it like today GB might run out of gas. Also gradients over 4% may help a little although I'm not quite sure when the final obstacle is.
The worst thing about this course is that it the most selective aspect was a crash, not the distance, not a climb, not the aggressive racing.
I actually found it rather interesting, given how hard it was being raced. The tension of a full sprint for a worlds is something else.
But I don't overly enjoy the concept. Maybe sprinters deserve a race every now and then which they are guaranteed to win, but if them, should the cobbled specialists get one too, and an MTF for the climbers?
abbaskip said:Wasn't so much chaos as taken over by Australia and Germany.
hrotha said:Hushovd didn't have to work more than Cav personally last year, and in his case not even his teammates did any work. But Geelong rocked.
The problem is the course, not that sprinters are lesser cyclists because they're fast enough to fancy their chances in a bunch sprint.
hrotha said:If we can talk about things that aren't Cavendish... man, Freire, way to screw it up.
auscyclefan94 said:that's because recently, all he's been trying to do is **** me off.
boomcie said:Piece of sh*t worlds. What a horrible afternoon. This must have been almost as boring as a day in the life of Stephen Hawking.
Deserved win, but who the hell cares. I do not remember experiencing such boredom and annoyance in a long time, only thing I can remember that comes close is watching an episode of "Friends" with people that think it's a hilarious show.
Even worse than advertised.
 
		
		 
		
		 
		
		
 
				
		