- Jun 10, 2010
- 19,894
- 2,255
- 25,680
It wasn't flattish, it was flat for all intents and purposes. Sure, Vino won in Paris once, it's not completely impossible, but you know it's 99% going to be a bunch sprint. Not that I'm advocating a HC climb, but even there you can have breakaways succeeding because it'd be a lot harder to control the race and a second-tier climber could surprise. Cancellara was 4th, yes, but he had no real chance of winning, and he didn't bother attacking because he reckoned it was pointless. Same for Gilbert. Same for everybody else in the last 10 km.Cimber said:there is a difference betwen finishing on HC climb og having a flatish (wasnt totally falt) course. On a HC climb u imidiately eleminate most rider. On a flatsh course u favor sprinters, but dont eliminate versatile riders. After all Fabian finished 4th. Imho the teams could have put mroe pressure on the UK team and tried harder to make a selection, but too many team relied on they sprinter to pull it off.
The beauty of a WC race is that it isnt suiting the same ppl every year (but usually it doesnt exclude anyone either - and this year it didnt either)
A WC course can be harder or easier, but it has to be selective one way or another.
