Cance > TheRest said:
Tyler throws accuasations against everybody, he doesnt like, and the story about Cancellara never got very far. Anyways, Radioshack is not a very suspicious team imo. They win once in a while, but has been far from dominant. Horner might add to the suspiciousness, but the rest of the team is in no way suspicious.
Everybody who wishes to be a good cycling fan has to be smart enough to recognize when even their own favourite team performs suspiciously. Obviously thats not you
Okay let's see:
Frank Schleck: Just served a ban.
Chris Horner: Thinks Lance Armstrong is the rightful winner of the Tour de France 1999-2005 - i.e. if you pass the doping tests you're in the clear, no retroactive tests, external testimony, or police work allowed. GT winner at 41, with a passport showing haemoglobin levels increasing in the last week of the race.
Andreas Kloden: Found to have received a blood transfusion after stage 1 of the 2006 Tour de France. Came second twice in the Tour de France against heavily doped fields.
Yaroslav Popovych: rated 10/10 (joint highest) on the leaked 2010 suspicion list. Rider 16 in the LA reasoned verdict.
Andy Schleck: Matched a juiced Contador in the mountains 2 years in a row. Is ok with a doped Contador beating him but not ok with chaingate - i.e. doesn't want to look like a hypocrite.
Linus Gerdemann: Won the first mountain stage against a heavily doped field in the 2007 Tour de France, rated a 6 on the leaked 2010 suspicion index i.e. higher than Lance.
I don't assume that the youngsters are doped, but there seems to be a lot of doping knowledge in this team.
Of course, these are only the riders. The important people are Johan Bruyneel, Pedro Celaya, etc.
Not singling out Radioshack (could list a dossier for lots of teams), but you said they're not a very suspicious team, and they clearly are.