2013 Road World Championships: Men's Road Race, Lucca-Firenze 272.2 km

Page 64 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Jun 3, 2012
2,873
200
11,880
T-Nielsen said:
That is smart.

That is not smart riding, it's riding like a coward. I can understand when someone not pulls because of tactics (eg Valverde not pulling when Rodríguez is up front) but when he has zero reason to not cooperate, but just keeps sitting on the wheels of others before sprinting to the win in the end, it's just pathetic.
 
Feb 1, 2011
9,403
2,275
20,680
Eshnar said:
Purito:"I told Valverde to stay with whoever chased him and when I saw Rui Costa approaching alone I couldn't understand..."
I hope he punches him tonight.

[conspiracy]What if Valverde had already made a deal with Costa before the final attack?...[/conspiracy]
 
Mar 24, 2011
10,525
1,924
25,680
Fearless Greg Lemond said:
Why? I know Rob Ruigh also did not get DSQ at the Amstel but this one was of the same level, and, decisive.
Useless != unfair.

Just useless. I think Nibali too is considering DSQing himself.
 
Mar 19, 2009
9,892
1,790
20,680
the asian said:
Would have tried to attack. would have finished 2nd, 4th or 5th.

My guess is he would have been in an attack with Purito. No telling how it would have played out differently but my guess is either they would have stayed away or been pounced upon immediately.
 
Apr 16, 2009
17,600
6,854
28,180
Eyeballs Out said:
Couldn't really disagree with that although I'm not sure what Rodriguez could have done differently had he known Valverde was spent. Costa would likely beat him in a sprint
Purito would have saved more energy like other forum members are saying. He would have put a more devastating attack on the last steep climb. He was really playing the cards with Valverde in mind.
 
Jun 3, 2012
2,873
200
11,880
The Hitch said:
If Valverde was completely spent then even then he should have put all his last energy (which he used to win the sprint) to get on Costas wheel even for a few seconds in an attempt to get Costa to give up.

This. But Valverde always have the final sprint to the line in mind, when riding. Always.
 
Mar 9, 2013
1,996
0
0
Hugo87 said:
Remember that Purito has 34 years old and Rui Costa 26 years old, when Purito was Costa's age was a good rider (with almost 0 wins), Costa is already World Champion at the same age, so please don't embarrass yourself.

Besides Costa outsmarted them all.

Purito doesn't have the Clutch gene that Rui Costa has and he had to cry next to him while listening to the portuguesa.

Good luck for "your riders" next time, Costa will be even stronger.

Yes like the young Quintan who Movistar would rather have then Costa. Enjoy watching Costa perhaps top 10 a GT lol. What a dumb statement that is LA was a wc at young age i bet he was a better rider than Induarian in 93.
 
Oct 16, 2009
3,864
0
0
Eshnar said:
that'd be the most useless DSQ ever.
Not really, it would mean the riders who crashed with Nibali and managed to chase back on their own would all move up a place in the WC.
 
Feb 29, 2012
5,765
717
19,680
TANK91 said:
Yes like the young Quintan who Movistar would rather have then Costa. Enjoy watching Costa perhaps top 10 a GT lol. What a dumb statement that is LA was a wc at young age i bet he was a better rider than Induarian in 93 u dork.

G4L8X13H
 
Sep 30, 2011
9,560
9
17,495
Daniel Friebe ‏@friebos 5m
Body language between Purito & Valverde at press conference not the warmest. Ten minutes in, Purito hasn't looked at Valverde yet.
 
Mar 24, 2011
10,525
1,924
25,680
goggalor said:
Not really, it would mean the riders who crashed with Nibali and managed to chase back on their own would all move up a place in the WC.
I doubt they would even notice it.
 
Libertine Seguros said:
Probably, but why is that Purito's fault? Like I said, blame Valverde all you like, but Purito just tried to win that race. Hell, if Nibali hadn't lost Purito's wheel descending Fiesole, they'd probably have gone 1/2 as the two would likely have worked together to the final climb whereas Valverde would have sat on Costa, and Costa would have been forced to do the work to pull them back.

As I said, Purito made that race and would have been the most deserving victor. He's just spent 8 hours in the saddle to miss out on the World Championships by less than a bike length now to likely see the team get eviscerated in the press through no fault of his own but because his teammate, attentive and doing his job perfectly throughout, was asleep at the wheel with 1,5km to go of all the times, he's given everything he had and has lost out in the last 100m, and he's probably feeling pretty terrible. Then the fans start booing him for no discernible reason.

But, of course, Nibali did loose Purito's wheel, at which point the Italian was caught in the Spaniards' grip, while Costa took full advantage of the situation.

The point is that with Purito ahead in the closing kilometers, Valverde needed to play the stopper. Instead he sat on Nibali's wheel and let Costa escape, which was simply an unexcusable mistake; since if he grabs Costa's wheel, either the Portugese sits up and Purito solos for the win, or Costa brings Valverde with him to Purito and Valverde wins the sprint. Certainly Nibali wouldn't have.

Either way Valverde raced horribly in the most decisve moment.
 
May 15, 2011
45,171
617
24,680
TANK91 said:
Yes like the young Quintan who Movistar would rather have then Costa. Enjoy watching Costa perhaps top 10 a GT lol. What a dumb statement that is LA was a wc at young age i bet he was a better rider than Induarian in 93 u dork.

Don't be so rude
 
Mar 19, 2009
9,892
1,790
20,680
Bushman said:
That is not smart riding, it's riding like a coward. I can understand when someone not pulls because of tactics (eg Valverde not pulling when Rodríguez is up front) but when he has zero reason to not cooperate, but just keeps sitting on the wheels of others before sprinting to the win in the end, it's just pathetic.

You're kidding, right? He's the WC, ffs!! Of course it was smart riding!! Stupid riding was Nibali letting Jrod get that gap on the descent and Valverde not hopping on Costa's wheel. I usually hate it when people write something like this, but...have you ever raced a bike???
 
Mar 9, 2013
1,996
0
0
LaFlorecita said:
Don't be so rude

Well is Costa going to be better than Purito this guy thinks Costa is the big deal yet their is guys 5 years younger who have achieved more he as no chnce winning GT's.Im sure even you would agree seeing as your a fan of CF now.
 
Aug 16, 2013
7,620
2
0
Hugo87 said:
Remember that Purito has 34 years old and Rui Costa 26 years old, when Purito was Costa's age was a good rider (with almost 0 wins), Costa is already World Champion at the same age, so please don't embarrass yourself.

Besides Costa outsmarted them all.

Purito doesn't have the Clutch gene that Rui Costa has and he had to cry next to him while listening to the portuguesa.

Good luck for "your riders" next time, Costa will be even stronger.

Emotion is forbidden? Come on, he's 34 years old and he knows he lost his last chance to become world champion by a whisper.

Costa wins his races because he's way back in GC, he doesn't win against the top riders, like Purito, mano-o-mano. Costa no way he's going to finish on the podium of a GT, its just a stupid conclusion.
 
jaylew said:
You're kidding, right? He's the WC, ffs!! Of course it was smart riding!! Stupid riding was Nibali letting Jrod get that gap on the descent and Valverde not hopping on Costa's wheel. I usually hate it when people write something like this, but...have you ever raced a bike???

Nonsense. Nibali didn't let J-Rod get the gap, but took a wrong curve and then suddenly realized he was f-ucked, since, at that point, he was going to have to do all the work to pull Purito back. The rest was a foregone conclusion for the Italian - though not the Spaniards and they blew it.
 
Sep 9, 2012
5,278
2,492
20,680
rhubroma said:
But, of course, Nibali did loose Purito's wheel, at which point the Italian was caught in the Spaniards' grip, while Costa took full advantage of the situation.

The point is that with Purito ahead in the closing kilometers, Valverde needed to play the stopper. Instead he sat on Nibali's wheel and let Costa escape, which was simply an unexcusable mistake; since if he grabs Costa's wheel, either the Portugese sits up and Purito solos for the win, or Costa brings Valverde with him to Purito and Valverde wins the sprint. Certainly Nibali wouldn't have.

Either way Valverde raced horribly in the most decisve moment.
If he didn't want to chase it was stupid, if he couldn't, he couldn't.