deValtos said:
I think 2010 showed that GC contenders aren't as useless on the cobbles as one might expect.
Cast your mind back to stage 3 of the TDF in 2010:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/races/tour-de-france-2010/stage-3/results
Ok if Canc hadn't been chaperoning baby schleck he could've stormed off but you've got the more robust GC guys right up there Evans/Hesjedal/Wiggins/Vino/Menchov and even Schleck/Contador/VDB.
I don't see any big reason why someone with the physique of Vino/Menchov/Evans and importantly Wiggins couldn't be competitive in PR. It's just we never see it because none of them want to get injured.
You can't base that on 1 stage - far shorter than Roubaix, that went over the cobbles in 2010.
First of all the cobbles guys go on peak for the cobbles. Its a month peak, generally the top guys are on form already in Oman.
In July they are all on minor peaks or not even at the Tour, while the GC guys are on their major peaks. Of course the gc guys did better. They were the ones who cared.
If you look at the top guys from PR that year what they did at the Tour stage
Canc - could have won by 5 minutes, domestiquing for Schleck
Hushovd- staying with Canc knowing he would win sprint
Flecha - domming for Wiggins
Hammond- Not there
Boonen - not there
Leukmans - not there
Pozzato - not there
Of course the gc guys did well. They were the ones with their teams working for them and they were the ones who cared.
in Paris Roubaix, 50k of cobbles, 250k total, when these guys are on form, and they race like that, your Menchovs and Evans are not going to ever be in the hunt. Could they finish in respectable groups 3 minutes down - maybe, but there's no point in doing that.