Re:
Contador was very good.
Aru and Uran were poor in first part, but were able to limit their losses (relatively) during second part.
Porte was bad from start to finish.
Landa was awful during first 39 km, but better than Aru during last 20 km.
Hesjedal was almost as good as Contador during last 20 km.
Kangert was fastest during last 20 km.
Thank you.Googolplex said:Full intermediate times and also sector times calculated:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1IIQGUaQydKnh5gvZqZ2Fse56SRZkn7b3I7f9HPM68rk/edit?usp=sharing
Contador was very good.
Aru and Uran were poor in first part, but were able to limit their losses (relatively) during second part.
Porte was bad from start to finish.
Landa was awful during first 39 km, but better than Aru during last 20 km.
Hesjedal was almost as good as Contador during last 20 km.
Kangert was fastest during last 20 km.