2016 Tour de France, Stage 5: Limoges → Le Lioran (216km)

Page 21 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Re: Re:

Eclipse said:
Carols said:
Eclipse said:
MartinGT said:
So Movistar ride hard, isolate their leader? Trying to shell Bertie?

Yah they clearly wanted to test where he was and see if they could break him, but he's fine for a day like this.

Bala is still there no? Nairito isn't isolated. But my eyes are very old.

Yeah he isn't isolated, but the general sentiment that they burnt their support to try and see if Contador would crack remains the same

Oh they tried hard, but he is surviving....so far!
 
Re: Re:

DFA123 said:
Eclipse said:
Carols said:
Eclipse said:
MartinGT said:
So Movistar ride hard, isolate their leader? Trying to shell Bertie?

Yah they clearly wanted to test where he was and see if they could break him, but he's fine for a day like this.

Bala is still there no? Nairito isn't isolated. But my eyes are very old.

Yeah he isn't isolated, but the general sentiment that they burnt their support to try and see if Contador would crack remains the same
Weren't they just riding because there was a possibility that Valverde could win the stageand take yellow, but once they saw how strong GVA was staying, they kind of gave up?

Not sure it was anything to do with Contador. It's not like he's going to be a threat to Quintana anyway.

If they wanted the stage and yellow they'd have stopped the gap going out to 15mins in the first place rather than just absolutely hammering on a single climb
 
Re:

Popchu said:
I really don't get it why Etixx didn't had one rider pulling in the peloton, for an eventual stage win or yellow jersey. Even if Alaphilippe is bad, you still have Martin.
Indeed. I've always found it strange how some teams are willing to sacrifice their entire team to get a flat sprint, while almost no teams are willing to sacrifice anyone on stages like this, even if they on paper would have a great chance of winning.
 
Re: Re:

Eclipse said:
If they wanted the stage and yellow they'd have stopped the gap going out to 15mins in the first place rather than just absolutely hammering on a single climb
Looks like they just misjudged it, didn't think GVA was so strong. You could say the same about Contador. If they really wanted to drop him, they'd have gone hard on both climbs, not just trying to drop him on one of them.

It just makes no sense for them to waste energy to drop Contador. If Quintana doesn't even finish above Contador, he's certainly not going to be beating Froome and probably won't be on the podium.
 
Jul 4, 2016
18
0
0
Re: Re:

"Denigrating commenting style toward others and clinic suggestions toward Contador in just a few points.
Maybe im overreacting."

INvading your personal space, trigger you? Oh people like you bore the world to death.

Im talking about the race, stop make me react to your crying. ffs.
 
Re: Re:

maltiv said:
Popchu said:
I really don't get it why Etixx didn't had one rider pulling in the peloton, for an eventual stage win or yellow jersey. Even if Alaphilippe is bad, you still have Martin.
Indeed. I've always found it strange how some teams are willing to sacrifice their entire team to get a flat sprint, while almost no teams are willing to sacrifice anyone on stages like this, even if they on paper would have a great chance of winning.

It's a lot harder to chase in the hills. You need riders to be able to ride hard over hills. A lot of teams have no team for it.