Re: Re:
He said his sprinting on the flat is overrated, not the overall rider.El Pistolero said:GuyIncognito said:Dekker_Tifosi said:It's the same thing with people asking why GVA is waiting for his sprint against people like Degenkolb and Sagan. He has beaten them before after a tough race. It's possible
Van Avermaet has beaten Sagan and Degenkolb uphill, like the old Omloop finish or the Schwarzenbach uphill in switzerland. Completely different.
Yes he is very very good uphill, but in a flat sprint, GVA is by and large overrated and has hardly ever beat anyone who is truly quick. Hell, he loses nearly every time to guys who are fast but not sprinters like Roux. Who was it that went through his sprints against Valverde earlier this year and it turned out he's never won a single one, was it Koronin?
Anyway, my point is Van Avermaet's sprinting on the flat is mostly overrated. It's good but not earth shattering. If you're reliably beaten by the likes of Nathan Haas, you have to attack. Which is why he does. Van Aert not doing the same is a bit baffling. If not for the crash taking out Albasini Van Aert's only medal would be a participation one.
edit: spelling
GVA is not over-rated and he doesn't even compete in the same races as Valverde, so such a comparison makes no sense. I do know that GVA kicked Valverde's *** at the Olympics and that was on a route that suited Valverde a lot more.