The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
That's really underselling his effort. He pulled a lot on the flat after bridging to Nibali, Pinot and Roglic and was still good enough on the final two climbs to finish with the likes of Valverde and Woods.He was very impressive last year on the Sormano descent and that's about all.
No, he was not. Only descent was impressive, uphill he was average, or even below. He was not good on Sormano (not in the first 10), he was not good at Civiglio, and he was not good on San Fermo.That's really underselling his effort. He pulled a lot on the flat after bridging to Nibali, Pinot and Roglic and was still good enough on the final two climbs to finish with the likes of Valverde and Woods.
He was 12th, 1'31" behind Pinot.
Roglic finished more than 3 minutes behind Pinot after being in the same break.
I'm genuinely convinced he was the third strongest rider on that day.
This take on Bernal's performance in last year's Lombardia truly surprises me.No, he was not. Only descent was impressive, uphill he was average, or even below. He was not good on Sormano (not in the first 10), he was not good at Civiglio, and he was not good on San Fermo.
Dan Martin was probably the 3rd strongest guy, Rafal Majka was strong too. Roglic was probably more impressive too despite finishing 1.5 min behind.
Of course, but his shape wasn't great at all, so that performance suggests to me he will be very good in climbers classic like this. Not necessarily Liege.Nobody is arguing Bernal getting 12th in a climbing classic is a fluke. But really it's no sign of one day classic genius either considering Quintana and Contador have both done better at Il Lombardia.
I agree. In addition, Bernal was already 13th at Lombardia as a 20-year-old in 2017. That certainly suggests that he has the potential to do very well in this race.Of course, but his shape wasn't great at all, so that performance suggests to me he will be very good in climbers classic like this. Not necessarily Liege.
I have zero doubts Bernal will be competitive in this race for many years. Most riders we consider contenders for Saturday failed to crack the top 30 of this race before turning 25. He was 13th at 20.I agree. In addition, Bernal was already 13th at Lombardia as a 20-year-old in 2017. That certainly suggests that he has the potential to do very well in this race.
Also did it mostly alone for the last 5km of the climb. I think it's one of the most underrated climbing performances in the last few years.OROPA (7.50 km, 7.67 %, 575 m) | #GranPiemonte
1993 | 19:45 | Ugrumov
1999 | 18:33 | Pantani
2007 | 19:52 | Piepoli
2014 | 20:13 | N.Quintana
2017 | 19:17 | T.Dumoulin
2019 | 19:52 | Bernal
Dumoulin better than Bernal confirmed
On a stage like 2017 I don't think even peak Bernal would be that spectacular. That's the kind of mountain stage where Froome and Dumoulin shine.Well clearly Bernal is not in top shape here. But that's what I mean when I'm not sure he would've beaten Froome or Dumoulin in top form. Same with Roglic even.