mountains in the first 2 stages around Nice. 1500m of height gain in stage 1 and over 3000 in stage 2
I'm absolutely gobsmacked


I'm absolutely gobsmacked
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Stage 2 is super interesting considering how early it is.Red Rick said:1 is like 90% reduced bunch sprint.
2 is, well, interesting.
Olympics.Valv.Piti said:Stage 2 is super interesting considering how early it is.Red Rick said:1 is like 90% reduced bunch sprint.
2 is, well, interesting.
Also, the Tour 2020 will start very early. For some reason I like that better.
It really depends on if it replaces a flattish stage or if it replaces a mountain stage later in the race. If it's the latter, it's actually bad.Valv.Piti said:Stage 2 is super interesting considering how early it is.Red Rick said:1 is like 90% reduced bunch sprint.
2 is, well, interesting.
Also, the Tour 2020 will start very early. For some reason I like that better.
1 is unfancied classics specialist wins from small break as the GC contenders watch each other and are happy for Alaf/GvA/Random Astana Dane to have yellow for a few days.Red Rick said:1 is like 90% reduced bunch sprint.
2 is, well, interesting.
Aspremont is just not hard enough to drop all sprinters and it's too far from the finish to get any attackers to get a decent chance.Leinster said:1 is unfancied classics specialist wins from small break as the GC contenders watch each other and are happy for Alaf/GvA/Random Astana Dane to have yellow for a few days.Red Rick said:1 is like 90% reduced bunch sprint.
2 is, well, interesting.
not exactly in the same place, but just a bit further down the road, if those profiles on la-flamme-rouge are correct:Red Rick said:Random question.
Do they have the same finish for both stages?
sir fly said:Awesome climbs in Alpes Maritimes, yet the ASO's avoiding them.
Turini is more like an exception, than the hint of a trend change.
But, who knows... maybe this year's heights encourage them to visit the range.
And it's not only about the race organizers. The local governments have a say, as well... no real need for publicity and promotion there.
Leinster said:1 is unfancied classics specialist wins from small break as the GC contenders watch each other and are happy for Alaf/GvA/Random Astana Dane to have yellow for a few days.Red Rick said:1 is like 90% reduced bunch sprint.
2 is, well, interesting.
It’s 41km from the end, with 650m of climbing in 29 km before the final summit. It’s not for the pure climbers, but if there are spilts over those final 2 team tactics will come into play; if Sky or Movistar or Jumbo see a chance to damage a rival, those last 40km will be raced at record speed. If Sagan or Demare survive to the top, a sprint train will form. But if the heads of state are all together, and the sprinters miss the bus, nobody’s going to chase Tony Gallopin.skidmark said:Leinster said:1 is unfancied classics specialist wins from small break as the GC contenders watch each other and are happy for Alaf/GvA/Random Astana Dane to have yellow for a few days.Red Rick said:1 is like 90% reduced bunch sprint.
2 is, well, interesting.
Maybe if it was stage 17 or something. It's stage 1 of the Tour with yellow at stake, there is no way any break goes up the road. Plus the climbs are ~500m in height and the last one is 50km from the end. I don't think a straight up bunch sprint is out of the question.
Yes, the holiday season there is well-known for a long time already. No rest for the Gendarmerie, though.Bye Bye Bicycle said:sir fly said:Awesome climbs in Alpes Maritimes, yet the ASO's avoiding them.
Turini is more like an exception, than the hint of a trend change.
But, who knows... maybe this year's heights encourage them to visit the range.
And it's not only about the race organizers. The local governments have a say, as well... no real need for publicity and promotion there.
In July hotels and roads in the Côte d'Azur region are notoriously overcrowded. Fitting in the Tour would lead to total collapse of the whole region.
The earlier start in 2020 may be the reason it finally worked out to visit this part of France again.
roundabout said:an ITT would have been better than stage 1
a coherent medium mountain stage would have been better than stage 2
Exactly, this is as good of a GD you can get. I think both stages will be good and worthwhile watching in its entirety contrary to 90% of all other Grand Departs.tobydawq said:roundabout said:an ITT would have been better than stage 1
a coherent medium mountain stage would have been better than stage 2
Paris-Roubaix would have been better than an ITT.
The Rio Olympics course would have been better than a coherent medium mountain stage.
hayneplane said:Normally ASO go out of their way to go to regions with hugely promising terrain and then filter as much of it as possible out of the route or placing it in a point of the race that renders it irrelevant such as Mir de Huy halfway through a stage and the abomination of a flat finish in Ardennes classics territory.
Best early stage since Nibali won in Sheffield 2014 Stage 2.
One interesting aspect is that it will force riders to arrive very close to peak form rather than gambling on working their way in and peaking for the back end of week 3.
The best thing is climbing almost straight after the flag drop will give a strong start to the Mountains jersey battle and a chance for a very strong break to form.